Study links diversity, increased board engagement
Published date | 01 May 2018 |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1002/nba.30448 |
Date | 01 May 2018 |
MAY 2018 NONPROFIT BUSINESS ADVISOR
5
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company • All rights reserved
DOI: 10.1002/nba
Board Issues
Study links diversity, increased board engagement
Data collected on over 1,600 nonprot boards
show that American charities continue to struggle
with the quest for diversity—and are missing out on
some key advantages a diverse board offers in the way
of internal and external engagement�
According to research conducted by the Lilly
Family School of Philanthropy at Indiana Univer-
sity, nonprot boards don’t yet match up, propor-
tionally, with the demographic breakdown of the
general public in terms of age and race/ethnicity�
The typical board has far fewer African-Americans,
Hispanics and Asians than their actual popula-
tion statistics would warrant—7�5 percent vs� 13�3
percent for African-Americans, 4�2 percent vs� 17�8
percent for Hispanics and 2�6 percent vs� 5�7 percent
for Asians—and tend to skew quite a bit older as
well� Women make up about 47 percent of nonprot
boards, pretty close to the 50�8 percent women make
up of the American public overall�
For proponents of diversifying the nation’s chari-
table sector, the data underscore the need to increase
efforts to bring on more people of color, especially
in light of demographic shifts that are expected on
the horizon� Per the report, Hispanic and Asian
populations are expected to double by 2060, and
African-Americans are expected to comprise nearly
15 percent of the population� The thinking goes that
having members of these communities on the board
gives nonprots greater insight into their needs, thus
making it easier to tailor services to them—and makes
it easier to engage them in fundraising and other
forms of support�
According to Dr� Una Osili, associate dean for
research and international programs at IU, the report
conrms the advantages a diverse board offers, in
three key areas:
• Board member engagement—the level at which
board members participate in community building
and outreach and are engaged in oversight and gov-
erning of the organization, and whether they stay on
the board for the maximum time allowed�
• Fundraising engagement—as determined by
whether board members meet with potential donors,
whether they ask others for money, whether they per-
sonally contribute to the organization and whether
they attend the organization’s fundraising events�
• Advocacy engagement—the level at which board
members engage with policymakers, monitor the im-
pact of government policy and educate policymakers
on their issues/program areas�
Per IU’s research, female board members rated
higher in all three categories, while younger board
members also rated high in fundraising and board
member engagement� Certain ethnic groups also
correlated with increased engagement—most nota-
bly, Asians were highly rated in terms of fundraising
effectiveness�
According to Osili, the advantages offered by such
diversity come at a time when more is being asked of
nonprot boards in general�
“Increasingly, boards are expected to do more
than the usual governance,” she told Nonprot Busi-
ness Advisor� “Fundraising and advocacy are more
important for nonprots, and boards are expected to
help in those areas�”
She said the shift into these nontraditional areas
has happened over the last 10 years or so—beginning
after the Great Recession�
“There’s been a lot of thinking about how boards
can help the organization achieve its goals,” she said�
When it comes to organizational effectiveness,
board member engagement is critical, she said� And
as the data show, diversity improves on engagement�
So it makes sense for nonprots to invest in efforts
(See BOARD on page 8)
To continue reading
Request your trial