Structural Determinants of Municipal Police Force Size in Large Cities Across Canada

AuthorStephanie L. Kent,Jason T. Carmichael
Date01 September 2015
DOI10.1177/1057567715586833
Published date01 September 2015
Subject MatterArticles
Article
Structural Determinants of
Municipal Police Force Size in
Large Cities Across Canada:
Assessing the Applicability of
Ethnic Threat Theories in the
Canadian Context
Jason T. Carmichael
1
and Stephanie L. Kent
2
Abstract
Substantial theoretical and empirical attention has been directed at isolating the structural condi-
tions that lead to shifts in the size of metropolitan police departments in the United States. These
studies rely heavily on ethnic and racial threat explanations, which imply that larger police forces will
be employed in jurisdictions with larger minority populations. It is entirely unclear, though, whether
such accounts are applicable outside the United States. This study fills this void in the literature by
assessing the extent to which ethnic threat hypotheses can explain variations in police strength using
data on 40 large Canadian cities from 1996 to 2006. Results show that the size of the minority
population significantly influences the size of metropolitan police departments.
Keywords
police organization/management, law enforcement/security, race and crime/justice, other, critical
criminology, crime/delinquency theory
Introduction
Over the past several decades, the Canadian population has seen a dramatic expansion in immi-
gration that has, in many ways, changed the face of the country. Recent migrants have been much
more ethnically and culturally diverse than previous waves of immigrants. Census data show, for
example, that in 1960, only 3.2%of the Canadian population had family ancestry originating from
a country outside Europe or the United States (Statistics Canada, 1961), whereas today that number
1
Department of Sociology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
2
Department of Sociology and Criminology, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH, USA
Corresponding Author:
Jason T. Carmichael, Department of Sociology, McGill University, 855 Sherbrooke St. West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
H3A2T7.
Email: jason.carmichael@mcgill.ca
International CriminalJustice Review
2015, Vol. 25(3) 263-280
ª2015 Georgia State University
Reprints and permission:
sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/1057567715586833
icj.sagepub.com
is 20%(Statistics Canada, 2011). In fact, 2 of every 10 people living in Canada today were born
outside the country, the highest proportion among the G8 countries and the fifth highest in the world,
with most coming from Asia (including the Middle East), Africa, and Latin America (Statistics
Canada, 2011; World Migration Report, 2010). While conventional perceptions of Canada suggest
widespread tolerance and even the celebration of such sizable and rapid shifts in the ethnic makeup
of the society, evidence from social science research is beginning to seriously challenge this assump-
tion. Despite constitutional guarantees against discrimination based on race, national or ethnic ori-
gin, color, religion, and many other categories, disparities in a variety of important socioeconomic
indicators exist between majority group members and ethnic minorities in Canada. Substantial evi-
dence shows, for example, that visible minorities face discrimination in the labor market (e.g., Hou
& Coulombe, 2010; Pendakur & Pendakur, 2011; Skuterud, 2010), disparities in health outcomes
including a greater likelihood of chronic health conditions and increased rates of depression (Ali,
McDermott, & Gravel, 2004; Perez, 2002), in housing (Hogan & Berry, 2011). Together, these stud-
ies reflect the growing evidence that ethnic minorities experience a number of consequential forms
of discrimination in Canada.
A relatively small body of literature has also explored the extent to which discriminatory prac-
tices against ethnic minorities may have been introduced into the Canadian criminal justice system
(see Wortley, 2003 for elaboration). The primary cause of such limited scholarship is what effec-
tively amounts to a ban on the collection and/or release of race-specific crime or justice statistics
(for elaboration, see Millar & Owusu-Bempah, 2011; Wortley, 1999, 2003). Despite this limitation,
research suggests that ethnic minorities face discrimination at multiple points in the criminal justice
system from involvement with police, to bail, and sentencing. Studies have shown that members of
some ethnic minority groups (particularly Aboriginals and Blacks) are much more likely to be
stopped and searched by the police than majority group members even after accounting for criminal
involvement and other risk factors (Fitzgerald & Carrington, 2011; Wortley & Owusu-Bempah,
2011; Wortley & Tanner, 2003). This heightened police attention of ethnic minorities has contrib-
uted to their disproportionate involvement at higher levels of the criminal justice chain. Evidence
shows, for instance, that minority group members in Canada have higher arrest rates (Wortley,
1999), and research suggests that they are overrepresented in incidents in which police use lethal
and nonlethal forces (Pedicelli, 1998). When visible minorities face the courts, they appear to
receive similar treatment. Empirical studies have shown that ethnic minorities are more likely to
be denied bail (Kellough & Wortley, 2002; Roberts & Doob, 1997) and have a greater chance of
being sentenced to prison (Roberts & Doob, 1997) even after relevant factors including the serious-
ness of the offense and prior criminal involvement have been taken into account. Given such evi-
dence, it is not surprising that survey research has consistently shown that ethnic minorities in
Canada view the criminal justice system much more negatively than the majority group members
(e.g., Bowling & Phillips, 2002; Cao, 2011; Wortley, 1999).
Yet, despite such attention to ethnic discrimination in the Canadian criminal justice system at the
individual level, few studies have attempted to ascertain whether or not communities, in the aggre-
gate, are responding to fears about rising ethnic minority presence by strengthening criminal justice
apparatuses. In particular, no study in Canada has examined whether the presence of a large minority
population contributes to the size of metropolitan police departments across the country. The lack of
scholarly input on this topic should be rectified for two important reasons. First, the evidence out-
lined previously suggests that minorities living in communities with greater police presence will be
subjected to greater surveillance and subsequent criminal justice involvement. Thus, aggregate
expansion in law enforcement in jurisdictions with more minorities may be the source of minority
group overrepresentation in the criminal justice system.
Second, while conventional explanations for changes in the size of local police departments point
to rational assessments of factors such as crime rates, population, or budgetary shifts, a rather sizable
264 International Criminal Justice Review 25(3)

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT