A Stealth Drug Recall: Who Protects Consumers and Shareholders?

Date01 January 2015
AuthorNancy Lasher,Susanna Monseau
Published date01 January 2015
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/jlse.12023
Journal of Legal Studies Education
Volume 32, Issue 1, 91–129, Winter 2015
A Stealth Drug Recall: Who Protects
Consumers and Shareholders?
Susanna Monseauand Nancy Lasher∗∗
I. Introduction
In September 2010 William Weldon, chief executive officer (CEO) and chair-
man of Johnson & Johnson (J&J), was called to testify in front of the Com-
mittee on Oversight and Government Reform to explain the largest product
recall in the 125-year history of the well-known pharmaceutical and consumer
products company. The following case study uses the public testimony from
two hearings before the Congressional Committee and other public docu-
ments to trace the story of the recalls and cover-ups related to Motrin and
Tylenol products from 2008 to the Consent Decree in 2011. The case facts are
followed by three additional sections: the first provides background on the
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the regulatory process for phar-
maceuticals, including details of the standard of current good manufacturing
practices; the second section provides a primer on corporate governance to-
gether with a discussion of J&J’s board of directors and board committee
structure; and the third comprises a teaching note. J&J is a well-known public
company, familiar to most students. The authors have used this case with
great success in legal environment and business ethics classes to stimulate
discussion on ethics, corporate governance, and the role of regulatory agen-
cies like the FDA. The authors provide students with the case facts and ask
them to answer some of the questions before class so that class time can be
used to discuss the issues.
Associate Professor, The College of New Jersey
∗∗Associate Professor, The College of New Jersey. The authors would like to thank Tim
Pfenninger, The College of New Jersey, Class of 2014, and Terrence Bennett, The College
of New Jersey Librarian, for their assistance with this article.
C2015 The Authors
Journal of Legal Studies Education C2015 Academy of Legal Studies in Business
91
92 Vol. 32 / The Jour nal of Legal Studies Education
II. Case Facts
A. Johnson & Johnson and the Credo
In 1886 three brothers, Robert Wood Johnson, James Wood Johnson, and
Edward Mead Johnson, founded J&J in New Brunswick, New Jersey. Among
other products, the company pioneered sterile surgical dressings, first aid,
and wound care.1Today it is the world’s sixth largest consumer health care
company, with 275 operating companies in sixty countries.2It divides its busi-
ness into three segments: consumer, medical devices, and pharmaceuticals.3
The consumer segment, which includes over-the-counter (OTC) medica-
tions, baby care, and skin and hair care, had worldwide sales of over $14
billion in 2012.4Part of the consumer segment of J&J, McNeil Consumer
Healthcare (McNeil), manufactures and markets the well-known OTC med-
ications Tylenol and Motrin.
In 1942 Robert Wood Johnson, the son of J&J’s founder, authored a
landmark document: The Credo. The Credo states, “We believe our first
responsibility is to the doctors, nurses and patients, to mothers and fathers
and all others who use our products and services. In meeting their needs
everything we do must be of high quality.”5
In 1982 J&J and subsidiary McNeil stayed true to the Credo’s em-
phasis on the customer when six people died after taking cyanide laced
capsules of Extra Strength Tylenol.6In the aftermath of the tragedy, com-
mentators predicted that although the poisonings were not the company’s
fault, the well-respected brand would never recover from the sabotage;7
1Johnson & Johnson History: Our Timeline,Johnson & Johnson, http://www.jnj.com/
connect/about-jnj/company-history/ (last visited May 7, 2013).
2Our Company,Johnson & Johnson, http://www.jnj.com/connect/about-jnj/ (last visited May
7, 2013).
3Annual Report 2012, Johnson & Johnson, http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/JNJ/35-
78493118×0×644760/85FD0CFF-2305-4A02-8294-2E47D0F31850/JNJ2012annualreport.pdf,
at 4 [hereinafter 2012 Annual Report].
4Id.
5Our Credo Values,Johnson &Johnson, http://www.jnj.com/connect/about-jnj/jnj-credo (last
visited May 7, 2013).
6Judith Rehak, Tylenol Made a Hero out of Johnson & Johnson: The Recall that Started them
All,N.Y. Times (Mar. 23, 2002), http://www.nytimes.com/2002/03/23/your-money/23iht-
mjj_ed3_.html.
7Id.
2015 / A Stealth Drug Recall 93
nevertheless, J&J, emphasizing the company’s commitment to its credo’s val-
ues, recalled every bottle of Tylenol on the shelves and designed tamper proof
packaging.8It was expensive, but Tylenol regained its place as the number
one OTC pain reliever in the United States.9In 2008, McNeil brands Tylenol
and Motrin were again contaminated, this time in the company’s own facili-
ties, but J&J and its subsidiary, McNeil, did not win praise for their handling
of the situation.
1. Tylenol Recalls—Tribromoanisole Contamination
In April 2008 McNeil received several customer complaints that its Tylenol
products manufactured in Puerto Rico had an uncharacteristic odor and
caused nausea, vomiting, stomach pain, and diarrhea.10 McNeil tested the
products for microbial contamination but could find no cause; so it closed the
investigation and did not notify the FDA of the problem.11 In May and June
of 2009 the FDA noted several other violations at McNeil’s Fort Washington,
Pennsylvania, manufacturing plant including the company’s failure to meet
its own quality standards.12
After one hunded further complaints about the “uncharacteristic bad
odor” and reports of at least two children’s deaths possibly related to con-
sumption of Tylenol products, McNeil launched a second investigation to
determine what was causing the unusual smell13 and in September 2009
finally pinpointed a chemical called 2–4–6 tribromoanisole (TBA) as the cul-
prit.14 TBA is yielded from the “breakdown of a chemical that is sometimes
applied to wood that is used to build wood pallets that transport and store
8Id.
9Michael Waldholz, Johnson & Johnson Says It Is Convinced Tylenol Poisoning Was Isolated Incident.
Wall St. J., Feb. 12, 1986, http://search.proquest.com/docview/397950868?accountid=10216.
10Johnson & Johnson’s Recall of Children’s Tylenol and Other Children’sMedicines: Hearing Before the H.
Comm. on Oversight & Gov’t Reform, 111th Cong. 78 (2010) [hereinafter Tylenol Hearings I].
11Johnson & Johnson’s Recall of Children’s Tylenol and Other Children’s Medicines and the Phantom
Recall of Motrin (Part 2): Hearing Before the H. Comm. on Oversight & Gov’t Reform, 111th Cong. 66.
(2010) [hereinafter Tylenol Hearing II].
12Tylenol Hearings I, supra note 10, at 9.
13Id. at 78–82.
14Id. at 82.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT