Stakeholders’ Information Needs, Cost System Design, and Cost System Effectiveness in Dutch Local Government

AuthorTjerk Budding,Martijn Schoute
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12116
Date01 February 2017
Published date01 February 2017
Financial Accountability & Management, 33(1), February 2017, 0267-4424
Stakeholders’ Information Needs,
Cost System Design, and Cost
System Effectiveness in Dutch Local
Government
MARTIJN SCHOUTE AND TJERK BUDDING
Abstract: This study examines the relationships between stakeholders’ informa-
tion needs, cost system design, and cost system effectiveness in local government,
using a dataset of survey responses from 71 Dutch municipalities. Three cost system
design characteristics are examined: (a) the complexity and (b) the inclusiveness of
cost systems, and (c) their understandability for non-financial internal users. These
characteristics are shown to be only partly related to each other, and to differ in the
extent to which they are related to the information needs of internal and external
stakeholders, as well as to three cost system effectiveness characteristics.
Keywords: stakeholders’ information needs, financial reporting regulations, cost
system design, cost system effectiveness, local government
INTRODUCTION
A major topic in the field of management accounting concerns the extent
to which the design of cost systems is related to the context in which these
systems are being used. An important element of this context that appears to
influence the level of ‘sophistication’ of such systems, is the extent to which
organizations take into account the information needs of internal and external
stakeholders when designing a system. In the second half of the 1980s, Johnson
and Kaplan (1987) claimed that, at least among US private sector organizations,
The authors are from VU University Amsterdam. They would like to acknowledge the
helpful comments on earlier versions of the paper offered by the two anonymous reviewers,
Sandra Cohen, Henri Dekker, Jan van Helden, Martin Holzhacker, Jacco Wielhouwer, Eelke
Wiersma, and participants from the 2011 CIGAR Conference in Ghent, and the 2013 MAS
Conference of the American Accounting Association.
Address for correspondence: Dr. Martijn Schoute, Department of Accounting, VU
University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
e-mail: m.schoute@vu.nl
C
2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd 77
78 SCHOUTE AND BUDDING
the design of cost systems had become dominated by financial reporting
regulations, and that this had led to deficiencies in the information that such
organizations used for managerial decision-making purposes. A subsequent
series of studies has examined this claim, and found little evidence of a
generally held belief that financial reporting dominates management accounting
(e.g., Hopper et al., 1992; Joseph et al., 1996). At the same time, however,
Joseph et al. (1996) also found evidence that the management accountants
who responded to their survey used integrated financial and management
accounting systems, and had little discretion in the content of their management
reports.
Research among public sector organizations shows mixed results. Pilcher
and Dean (2009) have recently replicated the Joseph et al. (1996) study in
an Australian local government context, and found similar results. In other
governmental settings, however, research has shown that the design of cost
systems generally tends to be dominated by the information needs of external
stakeholders (e.g., Lapsley and Wright, 2004). In addition, contrary to custom
among private sector organizations, in which the level of ‘sophistication’ of
cost systems is usually mainly determined by the information needs of internal
stakeholders (e.g., Kaplan and Cooper, 1998), research has also shown that it is
satisfying external stakeholders’ information needs which leads to the usage
of more ‘sophisticated’ cost systems in governmental organizations (Geiger
and Ittner, 1996). Our current understanding of how the information needs
of internal versus external stakeholders affect the design (and, in turn, the
effectiveness) of cost systems in governmental organizations is still limited,
however, and prior studies argue that the literature would benefit from
additional research in this area (cf. Geiger and Ittner, 1996; Lapsley and Wright,
2004).
In this study, we examine these, and related, issues in a Dutch local
government context. Since 2004, Dutch municipalities have faced a somewhat
ambiguous situation, which may have an effect on the design of their cost
systems and (as a result) the usefulness of their information for different
stakeholders. On the one hand, due to changes in financial reporting
regulations in 2003, municipalities now have freedom in how they design
their cost system and how they provide financial information in their financial
reports. On the other hand, however, they are still required by law to provide
full cost information to central government (i.e., Statistics Netherlands) in a
prescribed and detailed format, and to ground some municipal tariffs (such
as for building permits) on full cost information for the services provided.
Dutch legislation does not prescribe how overhead costs should be allocated
for these purposes. A priori, one would expect municipalities to have adapted
their cost system to their own, internal information needs, especially since
the fiscal crisis, when the prospect of severe financial cut-backs should have
increased further their desire for insight into their costs, in particular overhead
costs.
C
2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT