Research shows more family philanthropists interested in ‘giving while living’

Date01 March 2020
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/nba.30731
Published date01 March 2020
MARCH 2020 NONPROFIT BUSINESS ADVISOR
7
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company All rights reserved
DOI: 10.1002/nba
Industry News
Research shows more family philanthropists
interested in ‘giving while living’
A new report from Rockefeller Philanthropy Advi-
sors and Campden Wealth that focuses on the phi-
lanthropy of wealthy families from around the world
shows that “giving while living”—that is, expending
their charitable dollars while still alive as opposed to
leaving charitable bequests after they pass away—is
increasingly popular among the wealthy.
The report, Global Trends and Strategic Time Ho-
rizons in Family Philanthropy 2020, was based on a
survey of about 200 families of signicant wealth who
are engaged in philanthropic giving. The responses
explore what motivates these families to give to char-
ity, the types of vehicles through which they donate,
what shapes their philanthropic time horizon choices,
popular causes and more.
Among the survey’s ndings:
More donors are weighing whether it is more
effective to have a predetermined end date for phil-
anthropic initiatives or to continue in perpetuity.
Education is the top cause families give to glob-
ally, constituting 29% of the average philanthropic
portfolio, followed by health at 14% and the arts,
culture and sports at 10%.
European donors are twice as likely to give
outside their region as those from North America
and Asia-Pacic.
Despite increasing global concern for climate
change, the environment receives just 8% of the giv-
ing portfolios in this survey.
Perhaps the most signicant takeaway in the re-
port is the changing attitudes about time horizons.
Nearly one-third of families are choosing to adopt
what the researchers call a “time-limited” approach
to philanthropy, concentrating their donations over
shorter time periods. Interest in this strategy has
grown by nearly two-thirds since the early 2000s, the
report said, driven by the desire to see the impact
of giving during their lifetime (30%), narrow their
philanthropic focus (23%) and transfer more of a
founding donor’s wealth to good causes sooner rather
than later (17%).
As an example, the report profiles the Jacobs
Family Foundation, which was designed to have an
endpoint based on the founder’s personal experience,
philosophy and desire to see an impact on the local
economy during his lifetime.
While “giving while living” is gaining, the vast
Former United Way exec sentenced for fraud
The former executive director of the United Way
of Santa Rosa County in Florida was sentenced to
51 months in prison after he admitted to 20 counts
of wire fraud and three counts of tax evasion stem-
ming from his embezzlement of funds from the
charity he headed.
Guyland Thompson of Milton, Fla., had been
afliated with the charity for at least 20 years and
served as its executive between 2011 and October
2018, when he was red. An internal audit of the
organization’s finances—coupled with an FBI
investigation—revealed a scheme where he kept
a portion of money intended for use to pay the
UWSRC’s regular bills and expenses by replac-
ing it with other donation checks no one at the
organization knew about. By conducting a series
of complicated nancial transactions to cover his
tracks, Thompson embezzled over $650,000 from
the UWSRC, prosecutors said.
Thompson maintained his scheme by making
fraudulent misrepresentations to the UWSRC’s
board members and employees, its parent nonprot
United Way Worldwide and bank personnel. He
also took steps to prevent internal or external audits
of the UWSRC from occurring that would have
uncovered his fraud, the government said. Thomp-
son then failed to report to the Internal Revenue
Service the extra income from his embezzlement
scheme, which ranged from approximately $86,000
to $99,000 in a given year.
The embezzlement led United Way Worldwide to
pull the UWSRC’s afliation in March 2019, and
the chapter shut down.
In addition to prison time, roughly $221,000 of
Thompson’s assets were forfeited, and an additional
$430,000 judgment was secured against him.
(See GIVING on page 8)

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT