Rapid Evolution of Emergency Management Culture

AuthorKyoo-Man Ha,Sang-Hyun Park
Date01 April 2014
Published date01 April 2014
DOI10.1177/0095399712454114
Subject MatterArticles
Administration & Society
2014, Vol. 46(3) 318 –335
© 2012 SAGE Publications
DOI: 10.1177/0095399712454114
aas.sagepub.com
454114AAS46310.1177/0095399712454
114Administration & SocietyHa and Park
© 2012 SAGE Publications
1Inje University, Gimhae, Korea
2Haeundae-Paik Hospital, Korea
Corresponding Author:
Kyoo-Man Ha, Inje University (Gimhae Campus), 607, Obang-dong, Gimhae, Gyeongnam 621-
749, Korea.
Email: ha1999@hotmail.com
Rapid Evolution of
Emergency Management
Culture: The Case of South
Korea
Kyoo-Man Ha1 and Sang-Hyun Park2
Abstract
With direct or indirect reference to neighboring countries, this article pres-
ents an investigation into how changes in South Korean emergency man-
agement culture have evolved via three components, namely, (a) emergency
and its impacts, (b) emergency management education, and (c) technological
development against emergencies, during three periods: the 20th century
(1900-1999), the decade from 2000 to 2009, and the decade from 2010 to
2019. The major tenet of this study is that South Korean culture, initially
and later, changed rapidly with the coherence of the above-mentioned three
components during the periods covered, going through the stages, in chron-
ological order, of emergency numbness, emergency awareness, and a more
rational response. Thus, Koreans need to wisely maintain the momentum of
this change by learning from the three stages toward achieving the goal of
emergency management.
Keywords
emergency numbness, emergency awareness, rational response, Japan, Taiwan,
China, North Korea
Article
Ha and Park 319
Introduction
Throughout history, catastrophes have broken out in South Korea (hereinaf-
ter Korea) and in neighboring Japan, Taiwan, China, and North Korea. In
addition, successive Korean governments began implementing modern
emergency management measures at the beginning of the 21st century.
Consequently, many have been analyzing not only the positive but also the
negative issues in the field of Korean emergency management. However,
most of these management measures are related to short-term viewpoints, as
they elaborate on current issues. In other words, the Korean government has
tried to provide visible alternatives for emergency management.
Similarly, very few attempts have been made to study the larger aspect of
Korean emergency management. In particular, no study has tried to examine
the change in the emergency management culture that is not easily visible,
notwithstanding the fact that a revolutionary change has recently gained
momentum in Korean emergency management culture. Neither has any study
examined Korean emergency management culture with immediate or distant
references to neighboring nations. Therefore, it is appropriate to critically
study how the change in Korean emergency management culture has evolved.
In the above-mentioned context, this study will delve into the change in
Korean emergency management culture, and examine the field of emer-
gency management from a broad and unseen cultural perspective. Certainly,
unlike previous researches, this attempt will lead to the exploration of very
different alternatives for Korea. Furthermore, this study will ultimately con-
tribute to the goal of decreasing human loss and casualties, economic dam-
age, and psychological disturbance for Korean victims.
For this purpose, this study will compare three factors, namely, emer-
gency and its impacts, emergency management education, and technological
development against emergencies, during three culture periods. These peri-
ods are emergency numbness until the 1990s (1900-1999), emergency
awareness during the first decade of the 21st century (2000-2009), and a
more rational response in the 2010s (2010-2019). First, however, a brief
theoretical background is provided.
Theoretical background
Characteristics of Emergency Management Culture
Emergency management culture includes the beliefs, behaviors, and other
practices in the field of emergency management (Erickson, 2002; Merriam-
Webster, 2011). Culture change in emergency management has many

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT