Racial Aspects of Police Shootings

Published date01 May 2016
Date01 May 2016
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12189
AuthorLorie A. Fridell
POLICY ESSAY
THE REVERSE RACISM EFFECT
Racial Aspects of Police Shootings
Reducing Both Bias and Counter Bias
Lorie A. Fridell
University of South Florida
The long-standing question of whether police are racially biased in their use of
force was reignited by the events in Ferguson, MO, in August 2014, and the na-
tional “discussion”(sometimes manifesting in protests, including violent protests)
continues. Lois James, Stephen M. James, and Bryan J. Vila (2016, this issue) have added
valuable information to the accumulating literature on implicit bias, which enhances our
understanding of how bias might manifest in police decisions to use force. This research in-
dicates that officers may be undervigilant with racial/ethnic minorities, and these findings—
linked by the authors to “counter bias”—are contrary to the laboratory research that has
shown individuals, including law enforcement subjects, are overvigilant with racial/ethnic
minorities, especially African Americans, in “shoot, don’t shoot” scenarios. In this policy
essay, I will review the key implicit bias concepts that can help us untangle these disparate
findings and then link those concepts to interventions for police to reduce both bias and
counter bias.
Implicit Bias: The Basics
Researchers have been studying bias and prejudice since the 1950s (Allport, 1979 [1954]),
and they “discovered” implicit bias in the late 1980s (Devine, 1989).1These researchers
determined that, similar to the manifestation of explicit biases, individuals with implicit
biases link groups to stereotypes (groups as defined by,for instance, gender, race, sexual ori-
entation, religion, and body shape) and these stereotypes impact the individual’sperceptions
Direct correspondence to Lorie A. Fridell, Department of Criminology, University of South Florida, 4202 East
Fowler Avenue (Mail code SOC 107), Tampa, FL 33620 (e-mail: lfridell@usf.edu).
1. Comprehensive reviews of research on implicit bias are contained in three publications of the Kirwan
Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity. They are as follows:
State of the Science: Implicit Bias
Review 2013
and
State of the Science: Implicit Bias 2014,
both written by Cheryl Staats; and Staats,
Capatosto, Wright, and Contractor (2015)
State of the Science: Implicit Bias Review 2015.
These can be
found at the Kirwan Institute website at kirwaninstitute.osu.edu.
DOI:10.1111/1745-9133.12189 C2016 American Society of Criminology 481
Criminology & Public Policy rVolume 15 rIssue 2

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT