Policing Human Trafficking

AuthorRebecca Pfeffer,Amy Farrell
Published date01 May 2014
DOI10.1177/0002716213515835
Date01 May 2014
46 ANNALS, AAPSS, 653, May 2014
DOI: 10.1177/0002716213515835
Policing Human
Trafficking:
Cultural
Blinders and
Organizational
Barriers
By
AMY FARRELL
and
REBECCA PFEFFER
515835ANN The Annals of the American AcademyPolicing Human Trafficking
research-article2013
Since 2000, the federal government and all fifty states
have passed laws that criminalize the trafficking of per-
sons for labor and commercial sex. To date, relatively
few human trafficking cases have been identified,
investigated, and prosecuted by local criminal justice
authorities. Using data from case records and qualita-
tive interviews with police, prosecutors, and victim
service providers in twelve counties, we discuss the
challenges local police face in identifying cases of
human trafficking. We find that the culture of local
police agencies and the perceptions of police officials
about human trafficking do not support the identifica-
tion of a broad range of human trafficking cases. Since
local definitions of human trafficking are still evolving,
police focus on sex trafficking of minors, which they
perceive to be the most serious problem facing their
communities. Reluctance to differentiate between vice
and sex trafficking minimizes the problem of human
trafficking and makes labor trafficking seem largely
nonexistent.
Keywords: sex trafficking; labor trafficking; policing;
police investigations
The Victims of Trafficking and Violence
Prevention Act (TVPA 2000) and antitraf-
ficking laws in all U.S. states now provide tools
and resources to state and local police to help
them identify and assist human trafficking vic-
tims and prosecute offenders. Despite signifi-
cant legislative advances, there have been few
Amy Farrell is an assistant professor of criminology and
criminal justice at Northeastern University. Her schol-
arship seeks to understand arrest, adjudication, and
criminal case disposition practices. Her recent research
focuses on criminal justice system responses to new
crimes such as human trafficking. She has led studies of
police responses to human trafficking and state and
local prosecution of human trafficking for the National
Institute of Justice (NIJ). She has testified about police
identification of human trafficking before the U.S.
House of Representatives Judiciary Committee. Farrell
was a corecipient of NIJ’s W. E. B. Du Bois Fellowship
on crime, justice, and culture in 2006.
POLICING HUMAN TRAFFICKING 47
official cases of human trafficking, raising questions about the empirical grounds
upon which these laws were passed.
Estimates of the extent of human trafficking victimization vary widely. They
are calculated from different data sources and the rigor of the research upon
which they are based is often questionable (Gozdziak and Collett 2005; Tyldum
2010). Critics of U.S. human trafficking policy commonly conclude that estimates
are overblown, citing the disparity between the predicted estimates of victims
and the actual number of victims identified by the police (Markon 2007;
McDonald 2004; Weitzer 2011). For example, the International Labour
Organization (ILO) estimates 1.5 million victims of forced labor and human traf-
ficking are in the United States, Canada, and Western Europe (ILO 2012), but
the U.S. Department of Justice reports only a few hundred victims who are iden-
tified and assisted by law enforcement annually (U.S. Department of Justice
2011).
Previous research suggests that local police and sheriffs are woefully unaware
of human trafficking and commonly lack the training necessary to investigate
these crimes (Farrell, McDevitt, and Fahy 2010; Gallagher and Holmes 2008;
Newton, Mulcahy, and Martin 2008; Wilson, Walsh, and Kleuber 2006). The
cases that the police do identify differ from the types of human trafficking
reported by victim service providers. For example, although more than 80 per-
cent of the victims identified by law enforcement working on federally funded
antitrafficking task forces between 2007 and 2010 were victims of sex trafficking
(Banks and Kyckelhahn 2011; Kyckelhahn, Beck, and Cohen 2009), data from
the victim service providers in these same task forces indicate that “64 percent of
the victims served by OVC-funded service providers were identified as victims of
labor trafficking only, 22 percent as victims of sex trafficking only, and 10 percent
as victims of both labor and sex trafficking” (Banks and Kyckelhahn 2011, 7).
While there are some important differences in the mandates of police and victim
service providers, these differences suggest the cases these two groups identify
may represent different realities of trafficking victimization in local communities
and raise questions about the reasons for such discrepancies.
In this article, we examine police accounts of how human trafficking cases are
actually identified. The term “identification” refers to the way cases come to the
attention of law enforcement and are classified as human trafficking offenses as
opposed to other types of crime with similar elements, such as prostitution. We
find that the culture of local police agencies and the perceptions held by police
officials about human trafficking prevent the police from seeing a broad range of
Rebecca Pfeffer is an assistant professor at University of Houston–Downtown. Her primary
research interests include underserved and vulnerable populations, victimology, and the pre-
vention of crime through education and other noncriminal justice based systems.
NOTE: This study was supported by a grant (2009-IJ-CX-0015) from the National Institute of
Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions, findings, and
conclusions expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of
the Department of Justice. We acknowledge Jack McDevitt, Colleen Owens, Meredith Dank,
Stephanie Fahy, and William Adams, who assisted with the data collection and the final report
from which this article was inspired.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT