Police Interrogation Practices
Author | Deja Vishny |
Pages | 399-412 |
9-1
CHAPTER 9
Police Interrogation Practices
I. GUIDING PRINCIPLES
§9:01 Miranda v. Arizona
“You have the right to remain silent. . . .” This refrain, made popular in umpteen police and lawyer television
Miranda
in fact, the Miranda decision (Miranda v. Arizona
Nowadays, it seems that everyone knows that law enforcement are required to read in-custody suspects their Miranda
the dictates of Miranda Miranda,
not read the Miranda warnings.
Miranda
stop questioning him (if the suspect didn’t personally assert his rights), Montejo v. Louisiana
the wording of the warnings does not have to strictly comply with the exact proscriptions of Miranda as outlined in
earlier decisions, Florida v. Powell Miranda
rights, Berghuis v. Thompkins
a certain amount of time has elapsed, Maryland v. Shatzer
not necessarily custody for Miranda
§9:02 Litigating Admissibility of Confessions
his Miranda
Miranda Violations.
-
in the interrogation room and why a coerced and (potentially) false confession occurred. Recordings can and sometimes
To continue reading
Request your trial