Perceptions of High‐Involvement Work Practices, Person‐Organization Fit, and Burnout: A Time‐Lagged Study of Health Care Employees

AuthorDenis Chênevert,Steven Kilroy,Patrick C. Flood,Janine Bosak
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21803
Date01 September 2017
Published date01 September 2017
Human Resource Management, September–October 2017, Vol. 56, No. 5. Pp. 821–835
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com).
DOI:10.1002/hrm.21803
Correspondence to: Steven Kilroy, Queens University Belfast, Management School, Riddel Hall, 185 Stranmillis Road,
BT9 5EE, Belfast, Northern Ireland, Phone: +44 (0)28 9097 5611, E-mail: s.kilroy@qub.ac.uk.
PERCEPTIONS OF HIGH-
INVOLVEMENT WORK PRACTICES,
PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT, AND
BURNOUT: A TIME-LAGGED STUDY
OF HEALTH CARE EMPLOYEES
STEVEN KILROY, PATRICK C. FLOOD, JANINE BOSAK,
AND DENIS CHÊNEVERT
Previous research demonstrates that high-involvement work practices (HIWPs)
may be associated with burnout (emotional exhaustion and depersonalization);
however, to date, the process through which HIWPs infl uence burnout is not
clear. This article examined the impact of HIWPs on long-term burnout (emotional
exhaustion and depersonalization) by considering the mediating role of person-
organization fi t (P-O fi t) in this relationship. The study used a time-lagged design
and was conducted in a Canadian general hospital among health care personnel.
Findings from structural equation modeling (N = 185) revealed that perceived
HIWPs were positively associated with P-O fi t. There was no direct effect of HIWPs
on burnout; rather, P-O fi t fully mediated the relationship between employee per-
ceptions of HIWPs and burnout. This study fi lls a void in the HR and burnout
literature by demonstrating the role that P-O fi t has in explaining how HIWPs alle-
viate emotional exhaustion and depersonalization. ©2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Keywords: burnout, employee participation, health care, job involvement,
strategic HR
Due to the plethora of challenges facing
health care employees brought about
by cost cutting, downsizing, and the
introduction of new public manage-
ment techniques, employee well-being
is increasingly attracting the attention of aca-
demics and practitioners alike (Townsend &
Wilkinson, 2010). One critical well-being out-
come particularly likely to result from these
challenges is burnout. Burnout describes a state
of mental weariness (Schaufeli & Bakker, 2004)
and is portrayed as a syndrome of emotional
exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced per-
sonal accomplishment (Maslach & Leiter, 1997).
Although the operationalization of the burnout
construct has been debated, most authors advo-
cate a two-dimensional concept that includes
the emotional exhaustion and depersonaliza-
tion components (e.g., Büssing & Glaser, 2000).
It is argued that the specificity of the burnout
syndrome lies in the combination of (1) gen-
eral reactions linked to stress, captured by the

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT