Overview of: “Too early is too Soon

AuthorJeffrey W. Rosky,Kevin A. Wright
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00764.x
Published date01 November 2011
Date01 November 2011
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
MONTANA EARLY RELEASE PROGRAM
Overview of: “Too early is too Soon
Lessons from the Montana Department of Corrections Early
Release Program”
Kevin A. Wright
Arizona State University
Jerey W.Rosky
University of Central Florida
Research Summary
Early release procedures will likely become increasingly necessary during a time of fiscal
uncertainty in corrections. To date, however, few empirical evaluations exist in the
literature to guide correctional administrators in making these potentially unpopular
decisions. The failure to appreciate fully the consequences of early releasefor the criminal
justice system (as well as for the general public) could lead to unintended consequences
in the form of increased costs and a potential decrease in public safety. The current
study seeks to build on the limited information available by evaluating the effectiveness
of releasing offenders early in Montana in an attempt to mitigate a budget deficit. The
results indicate that offenders released early from a prison setting were more likely to
recidivate (and to do so more quickly) than a matched group of offenders experiencing
a traditional parole release from prison. Offenders released early from a community
setting were somewhat less likely to recidivate than a matched group of offenders
experiencing a traditional parole release from the community. Based on these findings,
we assess three plausible explanations for our results:
1. A Reduced Deterrent Effect. A possible explanation for the relationship between
early release and recidivism identifies a reduction in sentence length as leading
to a weakened deterrent effect of criminal justice sanctions. Yet a sizeable body
of literature questions the empirical support of deterrence theory in general, and
this knowledge coincides with research that suggests that longer sentences produce
little gain in terms of reduced recidivism from an incapacitation and a deterrence
perspective. In our results, the early releasees from a community setting were less
DOI:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00764.x C2011 American Society of Criminology 877
Criminology & Public Policy rVolume 10 rIssue 4

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT