OSTROLENK, BERNHARD. Economic Geog raphy. Pp. xvi, 804. Chicago: Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1941. $4.00

DOI10.1177/000271624222100166
Published date01 May 1942
Date01 May 1942
Subject MatterArticles
225
observations.
For
example,
in
one
chapter
he
lists
the
outstanding
characteristics
of
Hollywood
as
youthful,
optimistic,
exhibi-
tionistic,
unconventional,
insecure,
bravado,
narrow,
self-centered,
cosmopolitan,
vola-
tile,
temperamental,
industrious,
and
nou-
veau
riche.
The
author
cites
evidence
for
some
of
these
impressions,
but
no
effort
was
made
to
measure,
for
example,
the
ex-
tent
to
which
movie
makers
are
optimistic.
Judgment
concerning
the
contribution
of
the
study
to
social
science
must
be
reserved
until
the
other
volume
appears.
MARK
A.
MAY
Yale
University
HERRING,
HARRIET
L.
Southern
Industry
and
Regional
Development.
Pp.
xiv,
103.
Chapel
Hill:
University
of
North
Carolina
Press,
1940.
$1.00.
This
study
presents
a
compact
overview
picture
of
the
industrial
composition
of
the
Southeast
(Virginia,
North
Carolina,
South
Carolina,
Georgia,
Florida,
Kentucky,
Ten-
nessee,
Alabama,
Mississippi,
Arkansas,
and
Louisiana)
as
revealed
by
the
Census
of
Manufactures
for
1937.
It
suggests
lines
of
growth
and
change
in
industry
to
bring
about
&dquo;optimum
production.&dquo;
Optimum
production
is
defined
as
that
which
in
the
long
run
leads
to
the
greatest
well-being
for
the
region
and
for
the
Nation.
One
hundred and
sixteen
separate
in-
dustries
are
briefly
discussed,
grouped
in
three
categories.
Group
I
consists
of
44
industries
of
which
the
Southeast
has
from
20
per
cent
to
100
per
cent
of the
Nation’s
wage
earners
engaged
in
these
industries.
They
are
characterized
as
&dquo;manufacturing
for
the
Nation.&dquo;
The
following
list
illus-
trates
the
type
.in
this
group:
industries
which
manufacture
cigarettes,
turpentine
and
rosin,
cotton
woven
goods,
hosiery,
fer-
tilizer,
wooden
boxes,
and
distilled
liquor.
The
author
considers
this
group
of
indus-
tries
peculiarly
suited
to
the
Southeast
&dquo;because
of
climate,
of
natural
and
agri-
cultural
resources,
and
of
skills,&dquo;
but
un-
fortunately
they
are
&dquo;by
and
large
low
wage,
low
value-creating
industries.&dquo;
The
proportion
in
the
Southeast
of
several
of
these
industries
would
be
much
less
had
this
region
not
offered
the
attraction
of
cheap
labor.
Group
II
includes
39
industries.
Indus-
tries
that
manufacture
men’s
shirts,
caskets
and
co~ns,
iron
and
steel,
bread
and
other
bakery
products,
and
clay
products
ex-
emplify
this
group.
The
Southeast
has
from
4
to
19
per
cent
of
the
Nation’s
wage
earners
engaged
in
these
industries.
The
author
suggests
that
these
industries
should
manufacture
primarily
for
the
region,
though
some
&dquo;might
expand
sufficiently
to
manufacture
for
the
Nation.&dquo;
Presumably
the
competitive
advantage
the
Southeast
has
in
these
industries
is
not
so
great
as
in
those
of
Group
I.
The
third
category
comprises
33
indus-
tries.
This
group
includes
those
in
which
the
Southeast
is
unimportant,
such
as
flour
and
other
grain
milling,
dairy
products,
and
pottery.
The
author
suggests
that
these
industries
should
be
encouraged,
at
least
to
the
point
of
supplying
the
needs
of
the
Southeast,
&dquo;in
order
to
add
variety
and
balance
to
its
manufacturing
and
help
to
balance
its
agricultural
economy
as
well.&dquo;
The
summary
chapter,
entitled
&dquo;Opti-
mum
Production
and
Opportunity,&dquo;
sug-
gests
that
diversification
of
manufactures
be
fostered.
It
urges
that
the
Southeast
be
made
more
attractive
for
the
high
wage,
high
value-creating
industries.
The
first
essential,
it
suggests,
is
improvement
of
managerial
and
processing
skills.
Public
education
should
assist
in
furthering
these
skills.
The
present
shift
to
a
total
war
economy
should
be
utilized
to
hasten
di-
versification.
The
Southeast
should
expand
its
chemical,
iron
and
steel,
shipbuilding,
and
pulp
and
paper
industries,
and
begin
to
manufacture
more
widely
for
itself.
These
and
other
suggestions
constitute
the
blueprint.
The
author
does
not
test
the
validity
of
these
suggestions
through
a
criti-
cal
analysis
of
the
factors
of
industrial loca-
tion,
industry
by
industry,
and
area
by
area.
Such
an
analysis
is
necessary
if
a
sound
pro-
cedure
for
&dquo;regional
development&dquo;
is
to
be
established.
HERMAN
F.
OTTE
Columbia
University
OSTROLENK,
BERNHARD.
Economic
Geog-
raphy.
Pp.
xvi,
804.
Chicago:
Richard
D.
Irwin,
Inc.,
1941.
$4.00.
This
book
demonstrates
the
dangers
con-
at SAGE PUBLICATIONS on December 5, 2012ann.sagepub.comDownloaded from

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT