Nonprofit Policy Advocacy under Authoritarianism

AuthorShui‐Yan Tang,Carlos Wing‐Hung Lo,Hui Li
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12585
Published date01 January 2017
Date01 January 2017
Nonprof‌i t Policy Advocacy under Authoritarianism 103
Public Administration Review,
Vol. 77, Iss. 1, pp. 103–117. © 2016 by
The American Society for Public Administration.
DOI: 10.1111/puar.12585.
Shui-Yan Tang is the Frances R.
and John J. Duggan Professor of Public
Administration in the Price School
of Public Policy at the University of
Southern California. His research focuses
on institutional analysis and design,
common-pool resource governance, and
collaborative governance. He is author of
Ten Principles for a Rule-Ordered Society:
Enhancing China ’ s Governing Capacity
(China Economic Publishing House, 2012)
and
Institutions, Regulatory Styles, Society,
and Environmental Governance in China
(with Carlos Lo; Routledge, 2014). He is a
fellow of the National Academy of Public
Administration.
E-mail: stang@usc.edu
Carlos Wing-Hung Lo is professor and
head of the Department of Management
and Marketing at the Hong Kong
Polytechnic University, Hong Kong. His
main research interests are in the areas
of law and government, environmental
management, public sector management,
cultural heritage management, and
corporate social and environmental
responsibility, within the contexts of
China and Hong Kong. He is coauthor of
Institutions, Regulatory Styles, Society,
and Environmental Governance in China
(Routledge, 2014).
E-mail: carlos.lo@polyu.edu.hk
Hui Li is a PhD candidate in the Price
School of Public Policy at the University
of Southern California. She will be
assistant professor in the School of
Public Administration at the University of
Central Florida starting in August 2016.
Her research interests include public and
nonprofit management, organization theory,
collaborations, and NGO–government
relations. Her current research examines
the development of environmental NGOs
in China.
E-mail: lihui@usc.edu
Abstract : Despite the increasing volume and significance of research on nonprofit advocacy, most studies have focused
on the phenomenon only in Wester n countries. This article expands the scope of the literature by examining the
advocacy activities of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in authoritarian China. This article focuses on three
aspects of advocacy behavior : advocacy investment and use of insider and outsider tactics. Data analyses of an original
nationwide survey of 267 environmental NGOs and semistructured interviews with 30 highlight how resource and
institutional factors—government funding, government affiliation, foundation funding, and peer collaborations—
shape NGO advocacy in China. The findings also suggest ways in which institutional actors may enhance NGOs
capacity for policy advocacy.
Practitioner Points
If government officials want to facilitate peaceful transitions of authoritarian regimes, they need to allow
more NGOs to operate and give them more support.
Foundations operating under authoritarianism may play a more active role as change agents by building
NGO capacity through the strategic use of multiyear grants and the provision of more generous overhead to
deserving NGOs.
NGOs may be able to leverage collaborative efforts among themselves as a way to enhance their overall
engagement in policy investment and advocacy.
P olicy advocacy is broadly defined as any attempt
to influence government decisions through
both direct and indirect means, including
contacting government, educating the public, and
mobilizing at the grassroots level (Reid 1999 ). While
many nonprofits engage in policy advocacy, they
vary in their advocacy investment and tactics (Boris
and Mosher-Williams 1998 ; Jenkins 2006 ; Mosley
2011 ). Nonetheless, the literature has focused mainly
on the advocacy activities of nonprofits in Western
democratic states (Almog-Bar and Schmid 2014 ;
Kim and Kim 2015 ), with very little attention paid
to nongovernmental organization (NGO) advocacy
in authoritarian regimes.
1 This article expands the
scope of the literature by empirically examining the
following research question: given the specific context
of authoritarianism, how do various institutional
forces—the government, foundations, and the
nonprofit sector itself—affect NGOs’ advocacy
activities?
Government officials in authoritarian states have
mixed views on NGOs. On the one hand, they may
impose severe constraints on the development and
operations of NGOs, partly driven by their fear
that freewheeling civic NGOs may become vehicles
for challenging authoritarian rule (Heurlin 2010 ;
Spires 2011a ; Wiktorowicz 2002 ). As Bratton notes,
“NGOs may sow seeds of political discontent and
provide organizational channels through which
opposition can be mounted against an incumbent
regime” (1989, 572). NGOs in Kenya, Indonesia,
Thailand, Chile, and Vietnam, for example, have
mobilized to protect and expand democratic space
(Clarke 1998 ). In response, many regimes have used
various tools to regulate NGOs. In Kazakhstan, for
example, the Civil Code limits political activities by
narrowly defining NGOs as social or philanthropic
organizations (Wiktorowicz 2002 ). In recent years,
however, several authoritarian regimes have begun to
realize that NGOs can help support service delivery
and resolve social conflicts (Teets 2013 ). In China,
for example, two distinct types of NGOs coexist: civic
NGOs initiated by private citizens and government-
organized NGOs (hereafter called GONGOs) that
are either spin-offs of government-affiliated service
organizations or direct creations of government
agencies (Tang and Lo 2009 ). Both types of NGOs
have used government funding to provide collective
goods. GONGOs have traditionally been funded
Hui Li
University of Southern California
Carlos Wing-Hung Lo
Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong
Shui-Yan Tang
University of Southern California
Nonprofit Policy Advocacy under Authoritarianism

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT