New kinds of agreements

AuthorJanelle Orsi
ProfessionIs the Director of the national nonprofit Sustainable Economies Law Center, and she is a 'sharing lawyer' in private law practice in Oakland, CA
Pages95-149
95
CHAPTER THREE
NEW KINDS OF
AGREEMENTS
PART 1: AGREEMENTS AS THE BUILDING
BLOCKS OF A SHARING ECONOMY
Building an Economy with Agreements
Agreements are the bui lding blocks of a sharing economy. The shar-
ing economy will not, for the most par t, be brought to us by legislation
or by solutions developed for us by large organizations and businesses.
The sharing economy consists primarily of the millions of agreements
that individuals make to share, form organizations, work together, and
exchange with one another.
In many ways, this entire book is about agreements and the reg ula-
tions that govern them. The chapters t hat follow are about the agree-
ments we make to form organizations (Chapter 4), to exchange with
each other (Chapter 5), to invest resources in each other’s work (Chapter
6), to work together (Chapter 7), to provide for one another (Chapter
8), to share rights to land (Chapter 9), to share rights to intellectual
property (Chapter 10), and to manage the risks we share (Chapter 11).
Those chapters describe models for the formation of such agreements,
the unique challenges involved, and the regulations that govern t he
relationships that people create by agreement. This chapter examines
some of the basic components of agreements, best practices in negotiat-
ing and structuring t hem, and unique qualities of agreements we make
in the sharing economy.
Agr eements t ake many forms: t hey may b e quick not es we exch ange
via email, spoken comm itments, careful ly crafted and detai led
ors85462_03_c03_095-150.indd 95ors85462_03_c03_095-150.indd 95 8/1/12 9:44 AM8/1/12 9:44 AM
96 | P  L   S  E
documents, and every thing in between. Agreements are also the tacit
and implicit understanding s we have about the way we interact and
transact wit h each other. As such, our lives already revolve around t he
making of agreements. A s lawyer/mediator Stewart Levine puts it:
We work and live in a “sea” (context) of agreements. You ca n view
your life as a series of agreements. A s you go through your day, try
viewing your l ife through the “lens of agreement.” From the moment
you wake up to the moment you go to sleep, your life is governed by
the set of expectat ions you have as a result of the explicit and implicit
agreements between you and others.1
In the sharing economy, many of the common and implicit agree-
ments of modern society will be replaced by new relationships that
we actively form to provide for ourselves and others. Think about the
implicit ag reement most of us cu rrently have wit h neighbors: we will a ll
live independently, purchase our own food, purchase our own goods,
and call on each other for help only when we are in a bind. We get what
we need by going to stores, where there is an implicit agreement that we
can select what we want off the shelf, stand in a checkout li ne, hand over
dollars, and leave with our chosen items.
The sharing economy essentially offers us a new resource for meet-
ing our needs: each other. This will bring us a much deeper involve-
ment with the agreements we make. Instead of shopping to meet all of
our needs, we will make ag reements to borrow, lend, share ownership,
collectively purchase, swap, barter, buy, sell, give, and receive from, to,
and with one another. We will have written agreements to share a car,
to sh are own ership o f housi ng, to bor row a rec reatio nal veh icle, to share
land for food growing, to share workspaces, and so on.
Agreements infuse a particular amount of certainty into our rela-
tionships. To the extent that the relationships of the sharing economy
are meant to provide for our basic needs, we need some amount of cer-
tainty. For example, we need to be certain that sharing does not expose
us to too much risk, we need to be certain that shared resources will be
there when we need them, and we need to be certain t hat our sharing
and cooperative arrangements can adapt when we need them to. We
1. S L, T B   A :  E  E  
G   R Y W 19 (Berrett-Koehler 20 02).
ors85462_03_c03_095-150.indd 96ors85462_03_c03_095-150.indd 96 8/1/12 9:44 AM8/1/12 9:44 AM
New Kinds of Ag reements | 97
will all soon be swimming in a sea of agreements designed to provide
for us in new ways. As such, it is t ime that we all—sharing economy
lawyers and lay people alike —become more fluent, facile, and dare I say,
obsessed, with the sk ills of making agreements.
Agreements as Private Sharing Economy Laws
An important characteristic of agreements is that they are, in essence,
privately created laws that are often publicly enforceable. When we
exchange commitments w ith one another, each offering something of
value to the other, our laws, with some exceptions, generally say t hat
we have created a contract. If we do not carry t hrough on our commit-
ments to one another, parties that are har med can seek redress through
the court system. W hile most of what happens in the sharing economy
will never go to court, our agreements are nevertheless built on this
foundation. The solidity of contracts we make in the sharing economy
will ultimately be backed by the legal system.
At the same time, not all agreements are contracts. For example, an
agreement to give something w ithout receiving something in retur n is a
donative agreement, and it is generally not considered a contract. Such
an agreement is said to lack “consideration.” “Consideration,” by the
way, is an unfortunate word to use here because many non-lawyers do
not know its legal meaning, and because g iving somethi ng for nothing
is, in another sense of the word, a considerate thi ng to do. Never theless,
it’s important to acknowledge here that the th ings we provide for one
another in the spirit of generosity, nurtu ring, or gift economy are ulti-
mately enforced by social expectation, not by legal contract.
Furthermore, not all contract s are enforceable. For example, con-
tracts that contain illegal terms ca nnot be enforced.2 This is actually
quite common, since our legal sy stem dictates many of the terms of our
relationships, such as in areas of employment law, landlord/tenant law,
securities law, consumer protection, and so on. A s described throughout
this book, ma ny of the agreements we make in the sharing economy
put us in legal gray areas. Some of these agreements will eventually be
examined by the courts; until t hen, in some cases, we will on ly be able
to make educated guesses about their enforceability.
2. I n addition, cert ain contract s must be in writ ing in order to be enforc ed, such
as contract s for the transfer of land, or cont racts that cannot be ca rried out within one
year. See the statut e of frauds, which exist s both in common law and stat ute.
ors85462_03_c03_095-150.indd 97ors85462_03_c03_095-150.indd 97 8/1/12 9:44 AM8/1/12 9:44 AM

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT