Networks and Governments

AuthorRobert Agranoff
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12835
Published date01 September 2017
Date01 September 2017
784 Public Administration Review • September | October 2017
Danny L. Balfour, Editor
Robert Agranoff
Indiana University, Bloomington
Networks and Governments
Robert Agranoff is professor emeritus
at the School of Public and Environmental
Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington.
Since 1990, he has been affiliated with
the government and public administration
program, Instituto Universitario Ortega y
Gasset in Madrid, Spain. He specializes
in intergovernmental relations and
management, and public/nonpublic network
studies. His current work includes two books
Crossing Boundaries for Intergovernmental
Management
(Georgetown, 2017)
and
Local Governments in Multilevel
Governance: The Administrative Dimension
(Lexington, 2017).
E-mail: agranoff@indiana.edu
Book Reviews
Anne-Marie Slaughter , e Chessboard and the Web:
Strategies of Connection in a Networked World
( New Haven, CT : Yale University Press , 2017 ).
304 pp. $26.00 (cloth), ISBN: 9780300215649.
A
grand strategy for the Digital Age
must at least partly be a strategy of
connection. It must accept the ubiquity
and power of networks and internalize both
their opportunities and their threats. But just
as the Digital Age subsumes the industrial age,
so must a grand strategy for our world operate
both on the chessboard and in the web.” Herein
lies the genius of this work. Unlike many who
have hopped on the bandwagon of networks,
Slaughter recognizes that networks are not replacing
governments and their influence, but arise out of
them and operate, exert power, and interact in
both traditional “institutional” and “networked”
fashion. It is imperative to “acknowledge the
state-based international order even as it makes
room for a people-based order.” An alert for
public administration–networks are not replacing
governments, but operate in dynamic interaction.
Based on a series of lectures delivered at Yale in
2013, Slaughter, a former state department executive
and former dean of the Woodrow Wilson School at
Princeton, develops a different look at foreign policy
and in doing so adds to our basic understanding of
networks in the current era. The chessboard is the
prevailing metaphor for understanding established
governments, once spelled out by Thomas Schelling
in Strategy of Conflict ( 1960 ), later articulated by
Joseph S. Nye, Jr. ( 2010 ), who described post-Cold
War global politics as a “complex three-dimensional
chess game” of military, economic and organizational
power. This is not the only domain, advances
Slaughter. It can obscure the web view, which is not
a map of separation but of connection, of the density
Public Administration Review,
Vol. 77, Iss. 5, pp. 784–786. © 2017 by
The American Society for Public Administration.
DOI: 10.1111/puar.12835.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT