Negative Consequences Related to Nonmedical Prescription Stimulant Use: Development and Psychometric Validation of the Prescription Stimulant Consequences Questionnaire

AuthorAlison Looby,Adrian J. Bravo,Nicholas R. Livingston,Ty S. Schepis,
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1177/00220426221093606
Published date01 January 2023
Date01 January 2023
Subject MatterArticles
https://doi.org/10.1177/00220426221093606
Journal of Drug Issues
© The Author(s) 2022
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/00220426221093606
journals.sagepub.com/home/jod
Article
Negative Consequences Related
to Nonmedical Prescription
Stimulant Use: Development
and Psychometric Validation
of the Prescription Stimulant
Consequences Questionnaire
Alison Looby1, Adrian J. Bravo2, Nicholas R. Livingston1,
Ty S. Schepis3, and Stimulant Norms and Prevalence
(SNAP) Study Team
Abstract
Nonmedical prescription stimulant use (NPS) is prevalent among undergraduates and associated
with several negative consequences. However, no validated measures exist assessing NPS-
related consequences. The present study aimed to develop and psychometrically validate a
Prescription Stimulant Consequences Questionnaire (PSCQ) for use among college students.
A multisite sample of college students endorsing NPS (N = 715, 68.4% female) completed the
PSCQ and measures of NPS frequency and correlates of NPS via an online survey. Exploratory
factor analysis supported a 27-item measure, with three factors (i.e., Compulsive Behavior, Risky
Behaviors, and Physical and Mental Health) and a total score. Each PSCQ factor and total score
demonstrated good internal consistency, and were significantly positively associated with all
NPS frequency indicators, route of administration, alcohol-related problems, sleep problems,
and depressive/anxiety symptoms. Findings demonstrate support for the psychometric validity
and reliability of the newly developed PSCQ, which may demonstrate potential as a screening
and outcome measure for intervention.
Keywords
prescription stimulants, consequences, assessment, college students
1Department of Psychology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA
2Department of Psychological Sciences, William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA, USA
3Department of Psychology, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, USA
†This project was completed by the Stimulant Norms and Prevalence (SNAP) Study Team, which includes the
following investigators (in alphabetical order): Adrian J. Bravo, William & Mary (Co-PI); Bradley T. Conner, Colorado
State University; Mitch Earleywine, University at Albany, State University of New York; James Henson, Old Dominion
University; Alison Looby, University of Wyoming (Co-PI); Mark A. Prince, Colorado State University; Ty Schepis,
Texas State University; Margo Villarosa-Hurlocker, University of New Mexico.
Corresponding Author:
Alison Looby, PhD, Department of Psychology, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Ave, Dept. 3415, Laramie,
WY 82071, USA.
Email: alooby@uwyo.edu
093606
JODXXX10.1177/00220426221093606Journal of Drug IssuesLooby et al.
2
2023, Vol. 53(1) 114–128

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT