Moving Beyond Punitive Interventions

DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12391
AuthorCecilia Chouhy
Published date01 August 2018
Date01 August 2018
EDITORIAL INTRODUCTION
VICTIM COMPENSATION AND
WHITE-COLLAR CRIME
Moving Beyond Punitive Interventions
Public Support for Government-Funded Victim
Compensation for White-Collar Crime Victims
Cecilia Chouhy
Florida State University
There is a growing consensus in the United States about the need to reform the
criminal justice system and move away from punishment-based interventions
(Petersilia and Cullen, 2015; Pickett, 2016; Tonry,2014). Efforts have been made
at the federal and state levels to reduce the prison population and to implement rehabili-
tation and reintegrative programs (Clear and Schrantz, 2011; Petersilia and Cullen, 2015;
Pickett, 2016). Importantly, the results of public opinion studies have shown that the
public is broadly supportive of such policies and that people tend to privilege rehabilita-
tion, reintegration, and prevention over mere punishment (Cullen, Skovron, Scott, and
Burton, 1990; Nagin, Piquero, Scott, and Steinberg, 2006; Pickett, 2016; A. R. Piquero
and Steinberg, 2010; Sundt, Cullen, Thielo, and Jonson, 2015; Thielo, Cullen, Cohen,
and Chouhy, 2015). Indeed, scholars have pointed out the “pragmatic” character of the
American public opinion in which the goal of punishment coexists with more progressive
criminal justice goals (Unnever,Cochran, Cullen, and Applegate, 2010). The mounting ev-
idence regarding this public support for alternative criminal justice policies has illuminated
a new facet of Americans’ views and sensibilities toward crime, often obscured in accounts of
public punitiveness, which has been key in sustaining criminal justice reform and in making
it politically feasible (Cullen, Pealer, Fisher, Applegate, and Santana, 2002; Petersilia and
Cullen, 2015).
In short, the findings from public opinion studies can help policy makers in creating
“ideological space” (Jonson, Cullen, and Lux, 2013) that may help sustain key criminal
justice reforms and encourage them to propose nonpunitive initiatives that may otherwise
Direct correspondence to Cecilia Chouhy, Florida State University, Eppes Hall, 112 S. Copleand St., Tallahassee
FL 32306 (e-mail: cchouhy@fsu.edu).
DOI:10.1111/1745-9133.12391 C2018 American Society of Criminology 547
Criminology & Public Policy rVolume 17 rIssue 3

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT