Looking for respect? How prior TMT social comparisons affect executives' new TMT engagements

Date01 December 2020
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3186
AuthorJason W. Ridge,Federico Aime,Aaron D. Hill
Published date01 December 2020
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Looking for respect? How prior TMT social
comparisons affect executives' new TMT
engagements
Federico Aime
1
| Aaron D. Hill
2
| Jason W. Ridge
3
1
Spears School of Business, Oklahoma
State University, Stillwater,
Oklahoma, USA
2
Warrington College of Business,
University of Florida, Gainesville,
Florida, USA
3
University of Arkansas, Sam Walton
College of Business, Fayetteville,
Arkansas, USA
Correspondence
Federico Aime, Spears School of
Business, Oklahoma State University,
469 Business Building, Stillwater, OK
74078.
Email: aime@okstate.edu
Abstract
Research summary: We extend social comparison
theory and research in top management teams by
showing that negative social comparisons in TMTs
have implications for subsequent employment deci-
sions after executive turnover. In a sample of 1,001
executive employment moves to new TMTs, our results
show that executives with lower relative pay in the
firms they exit join firms that improve their social com-
parison situation within the new TMT when compared
to their previous experiencewhile not necessarily
providing larger improvements in pay. These findings
complement social comparison views on executive
turnover by showing that executives' new employment
decisions are guided by the correction of negative social
comparisons in their new firms.
Managerial summary: We show that executives who
experience negative social comparisons in pay in a
TMT because of their lower relative rank in its pay
structure select new employment in firms with more
narrow pay differences within their TMT. In addition,
we show that such executives improve their relative
pay in comparison to others in the TMT in their new
TMTs without necessarily experiencing abnormal
improvements in pay. These findings show that social
comparisons in pay between TMT members may not
only drive executive turnover, as previously shown in
the literature, but also directs executive decisions about
Received: 3 August 2015 Revised: 16 April 2020 Accepted: 17 April 2020 Published on: 15 July 2020
DOI: 10.1002/smj.3186
Strat Mgmt J. 2020;41:21852199. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/smj © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2185

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT