Learning from Locally Embedded Knowledge: Facilitating Organizational Learning in Geographically Dispersed Settings

AuthorPaul Vlaar,Bart Hooff,Marleen Huysman,Rose Erkelens
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1092
Published date01 May 2015
Date01 May 2015
LEARNING FROM LOCALLY EMBEDDED
KNOWLEDGE: FACILITATING ORGANIZATIONAL
LEARNING IN GEOGRAPHICALLY
DISPERSED SETTINGS
ROSE ERKELENS*, BART VAN DEN HOOFF, MARLEEN HUYSMAN,
and PAUL VLAAR
Department of Economics and Business Administration: Knowledge,
Information, and Networks Research Group, VU University Amsterdam,
The Netherlands
This article addresses the question of how geographically dispersed organizations can over-
come the complications for organizational learning that result from the locally embedded
character of knowledge. Based on a case study in an MNC, we identify a process of knowledge
pollination, describing how a network of experts facilitates organizational learning by par-
ticipating in various local practices, un-embedding and re-embedding knowledge between
these practices. This process is a combination of learning in practice (sharing practices at
various locations), network learning (using one’s personal network), and organized learning
(institutionalized methods of knowledge sharing). Learning in practice is the core process of
creating and applying knowledge: network learning facilitates this process across different
local and practical contexts and organized learning facilitates the development and extension
of network learning. Copyright © 2015 Strategic Management Society.
INTRODUCTION
How can multinational corporations reuse relevant
locally created knowledge in other parts of the orga-
nization? Knowledge is often embedded in the local
contexts of subunits or projects, making it difficult to
transfer it to other locations. A ‘local context’ refers
to a specific environment in which knowledge is
created, consisting of cultural, institutional (Lervik,
2008), technical, social, innovative (Hsiao, Tsai, and
Lee, 2006), spatial, temporal (Fahy, Easterby-Smith,
and Lervik, 2013), and organizational (Gertler,
2003) conditions. In this article, we explore how
such locally embedded knowledge can be translated
across contexts, thus facilitating learning at an orga-
nizational level.
Studies on MNCs show that the creation of local
knowledge is valuable for organizations in order to
meet local needs, realize economies of scope and
scale, and exploit local resources (Gupta and
Govindarajan, 2000; Ghoshal and Bartlett, 1988;
Nohria and Ghoshal, 1997; Zander and Kogut, 1995).
However, since knowledge is typically embedded
within a local context (Lam, 1997), it is often ‘sticky’
(Szulanski, 1996) and context specific, making it
difficult to exchange between contexts (Cummings
and Teng,2003; Gertler, 2003; Lervik, 2008; Sole and
Edmondson, 2002). This creates a challenge for an
MNC—to stimulate the creation of locally relevant
knowledge and, at the same time, to somehow
Keywords: organizational learning; knowledge embeddedness;
knowledge pollination; learning in practice; network learning;
organized learning
*Correspondence to: Rose Erkelens, VU University Amster-
dam, Department of Economics and Business Administration:
Knowledge, Information, and Networks Research Group, De
Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
E-mail: roos.erkelens@gmail.com
Global Strategy Journal
Global Strat. J., 5: 177–197 (2015)
Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com). DOI: 10.1002/gsj.1092
Copyright © 2015 Strategic Management Society
un-embed that knowledge from its local context and
re-embed it in the larger organization, in order to
make it more universally applicable in the organiza-
tion (Hong and Nguyen, 2009). In this study, we
empirically investigate how a particular group of
experts (internal engineering consultants within an
MNC) plays a role in this process of un-embedding
and re-embedding (a process we conceptualize as
‘knowledge pollination’) and, thus, facilitate organi-
zational learning.
Empirical studies on organizational learning in
geographically dispersed settings have addressed key
problems of local knowledge embeddedness that
limit organizations in effectively tapping into their
broad organizational knowledge base. For instance,
Cramton (2001) addresses the ‘mutual knowledge
problem’ of geographically dispersed collaboration
by identifying key communication obstacles that
hinder learning in dispersed teams. Figueiredo
(2011) reported that to overcome local
embeddedness in dispersed collaborative settings,
multiple embeddedness is necessary—i.e., embed-
ding people and their knowledge in both local and
corporate contexts. Hsiao et al. (2006) discuss how
the fact that practices (and their related knowledge)
are embedded in different work contexts complicates
managing knowledge at an organizational level. The
way the embeddedness of knowledge in different,
geographically dispersed contexts complicates orga-
nizational learning is discussed by Hong and Nguyen
(2009), Lahiri (2010), and Sole and Edmondson
(2002). These studies build on the idea that overcom-
ing the barriers that local knowledge embeddedness
creates for organizational learning requires connec-
tions between local settings through knowledge-
intensive interaction. The study presented in this
article connects to this idea by focusing on how
internal engineering consultants—a specific group of
experts who support projects and locations world-
wide with specific solutions and advice on complex
problems subsidiaries are faced with—contribute to
organizational learning by overcoming local knowl-
edge embeddedness.
We use a grounded theory approach to empirically
investigate the role of these internal experts in
dispersed organizational settings. Using semi-
structured interviews as primary data, we identify a
process, referred to as knowledge pollination, that
describes how an established yet flexible network of
knowledge workers can help in overcoming local
knowledge embeddedness by temporarily embed-
ding themselves in a local practice, un-embedding
the knowledge from that local practice, and
re-embedding this knowledge when they participate
in another local practice. Weidentify three processes
that are part of knowledge pollination, processes
through which experts contribute to organizational
learning from locally embedded knowledge:
-Organized learning, through formal instruments,
systems, and sessions;
-Learning in practice, through engaging in shared
practices with colleagues; and
-Network learning, through building, maintaining,
and interacting with a network of colleagues with
relevant experience and expertise.
Our study contributes to the literature by: (1) pro-
viding insight into how knowledge-intensive link-
ages can be established and exploited for
organizational learning from locally embedded
knowledge; (2) pointing out the dual organizational
objectives (of specialization and integration of
knowledge) that are related to both the benefits and
the downsides of embeddedness; and (3) providing
empirical evidence that managing embedded knowl-
edge is more about managing people than the knowl-
edge itself, and how internal networks of experts
contribute to this.
This article is organized as follows: we nextreview
the literature on local knowledge embeddedness and
organizational learning within the context of MNCs.
Then, the organizational context of an MNC, special-
ized in energy technology,and our research design are
presented. We explore the way engineering consul-
tants learn and apply their expertise in practice in
local settings, introduce the concept of knowledge
pollination, and describe how this can be seen as a
way to cope with local knowledge embeddedness.
The article concludes by drawing implications from
the empirical findings to shed light on how MNCs can
facilitate organizational learning in a way that takes
into account the situated and integral nature of
complex knowledge work.
THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
Knowledge embeddedness
In geographically dispersed organizational settings,
knowledge is embedded within the local context in
which it is created. This embeddedness is important
for the development of critical knowledge (Grant,
178 R. Erkelens et al.
Copyright © 2015 Strategic Management Society Global Strat. J., 5: 177–197 (2015)
DOI: 10.1002/gsj.1092

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT