Jefferson the President
Author | Arthur Rizer |
Profession | Director of Justice Policy and a senior fellow at the R Street Institute |
Pages | 61-78 |
61
4
JEFFERSON
THEPRESIDENT
As a teenager, I remember seeing two photographs of the White House side
by side. Under one, the caption read, “the night before Richard Nixon re-
signed as President of the United States”; under the other, “the night after
Richard Nixon resigned as President of the United States.” e pictures were
identical. Even back then, I noticed that there was something missing from
those otherwise serene images of the President’s home. I noticed that the
President was nowhere to be seen. I noticed that the most powerful man in
the world was basically removed from oce, and I noticed that there was not
a single soldier, not a tank, not even a policeman on the grounds.
When John Adams learned that he had lost the election, he simply said to
Jeerson, “Well, I understand that you are to beat me in this contest.” We can
be proud of the American tradition of peaceful transitions of power, some-
thing that occurs in this country even when the parties have been in heated
opposition. Such peaceful transitions were rarely seen in the world in 1801,
and are still rare in much of the world today. Our rst presidents—simply by
stepping aside for another revolutionary they respected—created a process
that has contributed to the greatness and the lasting power of this nation. It
may be true that John Adams was not overly cordial, was probably even rude,
when he left the capitol before Jeerson was sworn in. e more important
fact, however, is that he left, and he left peacefully.
With wounds still so fresh, Jeerson’s inauguration address, delivered on
March 4, 1801, was a speech of reconciliation. Because of Jeerson’s weak
62 JEFFER SON’S PEN: THE ART OF PE RSUASION
voice, most people had to read the speech. Like Abraham Lincoln’s second
inaugural address, given in the midst of the Civil War, Jeerson’s rst was a
full-faith attempt to ameliorate the political factions and coax them into co-
operation. Jeerson said, in part,
[E]very dierence of opinion is not a dierence of principle. We have
called by dierent names brethren of the same principle. We are all
Republicans, we are all Federalists. If there be any among us who would
wish to dissolve this Union or to change its republican form, let them
stand undisturbed as monuments of the safety with which error of
opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it. I know,
indeed, that some honest men fear that a republican government can
not be strong, that this Government is not strong enough; but would
the honest patriot, in the full tide of successful experiment, abandon a
government which has so far kept us free and rm on the theoretic and
visionary fear that this Government, the world’s best hope, may by pos-
sibility want energy to preserve itself ? I trust not. I believe this, on the
contrary, the strongest Government on earth. I believe it the only one
where every man, at the call of the law, would y to the standard of the
law, and would meet invasions of the public order as his own personal
concern. Sometimes it is said that man cannot be trusted with the gov-
ernment of himself. Can he, then, be trusted with the government of
others? Or have we found angels in the forms of kings to govern him?
Let history answer this question.
Even as President, Jeerson distrusted government. But as President,
Jeerson gave the nation a unitary focus, something to bring the disparate
political groups together and focus the national energy. Jeerson set his sights
on nation-building, not in the way that term is used today (that is, supporting
foreign nations), but in defeating those who threatened her citizens at the
frontiers and abroad and expanding the boundaries of the United States.
Five of Jeerson’s goals for America came to fruition while he was President:
(1) the Barbary Pirates were defeated; (2) New Orleans was secured;
(3) America’s land holdings were explored; (4) Britain’s eorts to keep the
United States subjugated were thwarted; and (5) Aaron Burr—a dangerous
political rival and constant thorn, generally—was contained and controlled.
To continue reading
Request your trial