Intimate Partner Violence and Intergenerational Trauma Among Indigenous Women

AuthorNicholas A. Jones,Renée Hoffart
DOI10.1177/1057567717719966
Date01 March 2018
Published date01 March 2018
Subject MatterArticles
Article
Intimate Partner Violence
and Intergenerational Trauma
Among Indigenous Women
Rene
´e Hoffart
1
and Nicholas A. Jones
1
Abstract
The establishment of the Indian Residential Schools by the Canadian federal government to
assimilate indigenous peoples to European and Christian ideals has had generational repercussions
on Canada’s indigenous peoples. Many emotional, physical, and sexual abuses occurred within these
schools resulting in significant trauma within this population. In order to shed light on these impacts,
indigenous women were interviewed about their experiences with these schools. Thematic network
analysis was used to analyze the data, and a number of themes emerged, including identifying the
relationships between residential schools, intergenerational trauma, and the normalization of inti-
mate partner violence (IPV) in domestic relationships. The findings add to the existing discourse on
IPV in indigenous populations and may be used to inform violence reduction strategies.
Keywords
residential schools, intergenerational trauma, intimate partner violence, indigenous women
A growing number of scholars have undertaken research to further our understanding of the
impacts of intergenerational trauma on Canada’s indigenous peoples (Bombay, Matheson, &
Anisman, 2014; Elias et al., 2012; Miller, 2003; Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada,
2015). Researchers have also made significant contributions to the study of intimate partner violence
(IPV; Artz, 2011; DeKeseredy & Dragiewicz, 2014; Gosselin, 2014). Brownridge (2003) reports,
however, there is a dearth of empirical research exploring IPV within the context of intergenera-
tional trauma. The current research addresses that gap in the extant literature through a qualitative
study undertaken with indigenous women in Regina, Saskatchewan. The location of this study is
important because rates of IPV in this province are the highest in the nation and are over twice the
national rate (Burczycka & Conroy, 2017).
The assimilationist laws and policies of Canada’s federal government policies are rife with racist
undertones. Both the Indian Act (1876) and the establishment of Indian Residential Schools (here-
after residential schools), for example, contributed to the marginalizing of indigenous peoples by
1
University of Regina, Regina, SK, Canada
Corresponding Author:
Rene
´e Hoffart, University of Regina, Cl 343, 3737 Wascana Parkway, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada S4S 0A2.
Email: renee.hoffart@hotmail.com
International CriminalJustice Review
2018, Vol. 28(1) 25-44
ª2017 Georgia State University
Reprints and permission:
sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/1057567717719966
journals.sagepub.com/home/icj
reducing their self-determination and suppressing their traditional culture, religions, and languages.
These efforts, in turn, had long-term negative consequences for these people and their descendants
(Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada, 2015) and altogether have been described as a
cultural genocide (McLachlin, 2015). It has been estimated there are about 80,000 survivors of the
residential school system alive today, although the descendants of these survivors have continued to
experience the effects caused by the disruptions to their parents and grandparents lives (Truth and
Reconciliation Commission of Canada, 2017).
Miller (1996) describes the original relationship between indigenous people and the colonists as
one of cooperation. However, in the years immediately following the War of 1812, waves of British
and European immigrants were arriving and bringing with them their cultural values, economic and
political systems, and religions as well as notions of racial superiority (Truth and Reconciliation
Commission of Canada, 2015). These colonists believed their way of life was superior to that of
indigenous peoples and was summarized by R. Ross (2003, p. 142) as, “all things Aboriginal are
inferior at best and dangerous at worst.” The colonial leaders of the era believed that indigenous
peoples should be assimilated into this superior cultural milieu (Truth and Reconciliation Commis-
sion of Canada, 2015).
A series of political decisions reduced the self-determination of indigenous people andcontributed
to their marginalization. In 1876, for example,Parliament passed the Indian Act which designated the
federal government as having authority over indigenous people in Canada (Menzies,2010). The long-
term impacts of the Indian Act included disrupting indigenous family life, dividing the lands of
indigenous people into reserve settlements, creatinga series of laws including the “pass system” (that
required the permission of Indian agentsfor indigenous peoples to leave theirreserves). Moreover, the
Indian Act forbade participation in traditional religious and cultural practices and ultimately served as
a machine of cultural assimilation(Menzies, 2010). The Indian Act also paved the way forthe creation
and operation of the residential schools, which have had a long-term destructive impact on the health
and prosperity of this population and has shaped the involvement of indigenous people in the justice
system (Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada, 2015).
This research seeks to address two primary research question s: (a) What is the relationship
between personal, familial, or caregiver attendance at an residential school and IPV against indi-
genous women? and (b) Does intergenerational trauma, associated with attendance at an residential
school, contribute to the normalization of IPV for indigenous women? This research is important
because the long-term negative impacts of colonial policies based on assimilation were also mir-
rored in Australia, New Zealand, and the United States, and the long-term outcomes for indigenous
peoples in these countries are similar across these nations. Conse quently, the outcomes of this
research have implications beyond the borders of a single nation.
Residential Schools
Indigenous leaders had first expressed the need for the education of their peoples in 1807 during
the first treaty negotiations (Miller, 2003). However, the educational arrangements that emerged
after indigenous peoples were placed on their reserves were seen as ineffective in carrying out the
goal of cultural assimilation, and as a result, the federal government undertook the establishment of
the residential schools in 1883. While many indig enous children were educated on their home
reserves, about 150,000 students were placed in these residential schools between 1883 and 1996
(Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada, 2015). LeBeuf observed that “the schools were
meant to become a home where children would see and understand the world through a European
system of values and beliefs” (2011, p. 2). In 1920, the Deputy Superintendent General of Indians
Affairs, Duncan Campbell Scott, referred to the residential schools as a method of eradicating the
“Indian problem” (Erasmus, 2004, p. 3).
26 International Criminal Justice Review 28(1)

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT