Institutional Conditions and Prison Suicide: Conditional Effects of Deprivation and Overcrowding

Published date01 December 2005
Date01 December 2005
DOI10.1177/0032885505282258
Subject MatterArticles
10.1177/0032885505282258THE PRISON JOURNAL / December 2005Huey, McNulty / PRISON SUICIDE
INSTITUTIONAL CONDITIONS
AND PRISON SUICIDE:
CONDITIONAL EFFECTS OF
DEPRIVATION AND OVERCROWDING
MEREDITH P. HUEY
THOMAS L. MCNULTY
The University of Georgia
This article uses national data on prisons in the United States to examine the effects of
deprivation, overcrowding,and their interaction on the likelihood of prison suicide.
Our central argumentis that overcrowding is a pivotal feature of prison environments
that conditions the effects of deprivation. Findings provide substantial support for
this hypothesis. Forexample, at low levels of overcrowding, minimum-security facili-
ties evidence a lower probabilityof prison suicide, but at high levels, they are as likely
to experience a suicide as their medium- and maximum-security counterparts. Theo-
retical and policy implications of the findings are discussed.
Keywords: prison suicide; deprivation; overcrowding
In the United States, suicide rates among prison inmates are higher than in
the general population and suicide accounts for more than half of all deaths in
custody (Kupers, 1999). Prison suicide is of important interest to researchers
investigating the effectsof incarceration on inmate adjustment to life in total
institutions. Prior research has focused on the individual characteristics of
inmates as explanatory variables, particularly indicators of mental health
(Anno, 1985; California Department of Corrections, 1991; Jones, 1986;
Lloyd, 1992; New York State Department of Correctional Services, 1994;
Skegg & Cox, 1991).1This focus is related to the “medicalization” of suicide,
the assumptions of which are evident in both popular stereotypes and expla-
nations of inmate suicide put forth by social scientists and policy makers.
The causes of suicide are widely assumed to reflect underlying mental and
emotional disorders, and hence public policy “seeks to change potential vic-
THE PRISON JOURNAL, Vol. 85 No. 4, December 2005 490-514
DOI: 10.1177/0032885505282258
© 2005 Sage Publications
490
tims,”with emphasis on the prediction, prevention, and treatment of suicidal
prisoners (Conrad, 1980; Hayes, 1995, 1999).
Although this research has provided the basis for suicide prediction and
prevention strategies, the exclusive focus on an individual level of explana-
tion has obscured attention to the larger institutional context in which the
event occurs (Lester & Danto, 1993). AsLiebling (1995, 1999) has noted, a
preoccupation with the individual is conceptually limited, and the individual
prediction approach has not succeeded in either understanding or prevent-
ing inmate suicide. Thus, there is a need for theory and research that moves
beyond the medicalization model toward an understanding of prison suicide
in terms of the institutional conditions under which inmates are held.
As a means to advance the literature, this article uses national data on U.S.
prisons (1990 and 1995) to evaluatethe effect of prison characteristics on the
likelihood of suicide. Whereas prior research has described the problem as
inmate suicide, we use the term prison suicide, which better captures that
individual actions are embedded in social contexts.2Specifically, we focus
on the effects of deprivation, overcrowding, and the interaction between
them on the likelihood of prison suicide. Deprivation theory predicts that
prisons in which inmates experience a greater loss of freedom, have lesser
control over daily routines, and are denied access to rehabilitative programs
will have a higher incidence of suicide. Overcrowding theory stresses the
deleterious effects of crowding on inmate adaptation to prison life,one con-
sequence of which is a greater likelihood of suicide. Central to our argument
is that overcrowding is a pivotal factor that conditions the effectsof depriva-
tion on prison suicide. This possibility has been left unexplored in prior
research, despite widely assumed detrimental repercussions of overcrowd-
ing in an era in which many prisons routinely operate over capacity (Kupers,
1999). The following sections discuss our conceptual framework in more
detail.
THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
DEPRIVATION THEORY
Deprivation of freedom has long been argued to be a primary explanation
of violence in prisons and other institutions (e.g., Ellenberger, 1971;
Suedfeld, 1977; Sykes, 1958). The classic work of Glass and Singer (1972),
supported by later research (Moos, 1976), has shown that the unpredictabil-
ity of, and lack of control over,environmental inputs are significant causes of
behavioral breakdown. Research generally supports the prediction that pris-
Huey, McNulty / PRISON SUICIDE 491

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT