Inclusion and commitment as key pathways between leadership and nonprofit performance

Date01 September 2019
Published date01 September 2019
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21368
AuthorKim C. Brimhall
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Inclusion and commitment as key pathways between
leadership and nonprofit performance
Kim C. Brimhall
Department of Social Work, College of
Community and Public Affairs,
Binghamton UniversityState University
of New York, Binghamton, New York
Correspondence
Kim C. Brimhall, Department of Social
Work, College of Community and Public
Affairs, Binghamton UniversityState
University of New York, 67 Washington
St., Binghamton, NY 13902.
Email: brimhall@binghamton.edu
Funding information
University of Southern California
Management, Organizations and Policy
Transformation Research Cluster;
University of Southern California Suzanne
Dworak-Peck School of Social Work; U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services
Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality, Grant/Award Number:
1R36HS024650-01
Abstract
Given the projected growth of workforce diversity in the
United States and the fact that heterogeneous workforces
result in both positive (increased retention and perfor-
mance) and negative (increased conflict and turnover)
organizational outcomes, nonprofit leaders are faced with
the challenge of effectively managing their workforces.
Findings ways to ensure positive workplace outcomes,
such as employee commitment (an emotional attachment
to the organization) and performance, is especially critical
for the overall functioning of nonprofit organizations.
Using longitudinal multilevel path analyses, this study
examined whether transformational leadership influenced
work group performance through both creating a climate
for inclusion and increasing employee affective commit-
ment in a diverse nonprofit health care organization.
Results indicate that transformational leaders help increase
perceptions of inclusion, which improves employee com-
mitment to the organization, and ultimately enhances per-
ceived work group performance. This suggests inclusion
and affective commitment as key factors for how leaders
can increase nonprofit performance.
KEYWORDS
affective commitment, climate for inclusion, nonprofit organizations,
performance, transformational leadership
Received: 22 December 2018 Revised: 2 May 2019 Accepted: 3 May 2019
DOI: 10.1002/nml.21368
Nonprofit Management and Leadership. 2019;30:3149. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/nml © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 31
1|INTRODUCTION
Nonprofit leaders and managers face significant challenges in the United States regarding the rapidly
changing demographics of the workforce (Osula & Ng, 2014). Population projections indicate that
by 2030, one in five Americans will be 65 or older; by 2044, more than half of all Americans will be
members of a racial and ethnic minority group; and by 2060, nearly 20% of the nation's population is
projected to be foreign born (Colby & Ortman, 2014). Although workforce diversity can lead to ben-
eficial workplace outcomes, such as increased commitment and performance (Mor Barak et al.,
2016; Roberson, Holmes, & Perry, 2017), organizational diversity has also been found to lead to det-
rimental outcomes, such as increased employee conflict and turnover (Mor Barak et al., 2016; Nishii,
2013). Finding ways to ensure positive workplace outcomes is especially critical for nonprofit orga-
nizations that strive to increase employee commitment and performance (Erdurmazli, 2019; Vecina,
Chacon, Marzana, & Marta, 2013). Due to many nonprofit organizations relying on volunteerism
and having limited resources to provide competitive salaries for workers (Erdurmazli, 2019; John-
son & Ng, 2016), increasing employee commitment (i.e., identification with organizational values
and goals; Allen & Meyer, 1990) to the organization may be one of the most effective tools for
increasing retention (Erdurmazli, 2019; Vecina et al., 2013) and ultimately performance in nonprofit
organizations (Erdurmazli, 2019).
Creating a climate for inclusion, or the shared employee perceptions of the extent to which the
organization helps its members feel valued for their unique personal characteristics and appreciated
as important members of the group (Shore et al., 2011), may be an ideal avenue for channeling diver-
sity into positive workplace outcomes (Mor Barak et al., 2016), thereby increasing employee com-
mitment and overall work performance in nonprofit organizations. Although some research has
supported climate for inclusion as an effective means for managing diversity (Mor Barak et al., 2016;
Nishii, 2013; Shore et al., 2011), limited research has examined this approach in the context of non-
profit health care organizations.
The current study aimed to examine whether transformational leadership (TFL), one of the most
widely studied leadership approaches in the organizational literature (Ng, 2017; Van Knippenberg &
Sitkin, 2013), and climate for inclusion, a relatively new concept in the nonprofit organizational liter-
ature (Mor Barak et al., 2016), may be important factors for increasing employee commitment and
ultimately performance in a diverse nonprofit health care organization. Considering the organiza-
tional context is especially critical when examining how leadership may increase commitment and
performance in diverse nonprofit organizations (Fredette, Bradshaw, & Krause, 2015; Joshi & Roh,
2009). More specifically, a climate of inclusion may be a key factor in helping leaders increase
employee commitment and performance in diverse nonprofit work contexts. Thus, workforce diver-
sity is part of the unique context of the study, whereas inclusion is seen as a potential organizational
factor that may influence employee affective commitment and performance.
The study sought to make several contributions. First, examining whether TFL and climate for
inclusion increase nonprofit employee commitment and perceived performance in diverse workforces
highlights new avenues for how leaders may improve nonprofit performance. This can provide non-
profit leaders and managers with a promising approach to managing diversity and facilitating positive
organizational outcomes (i.e., increased employee commitment and performance). Second, the study
examined whether employee perceptions of work group-level TFL (direct supervisors and managers),
climate for inclusion (feeling valued in immediate work groups), and employee commitment (emo-
tional attachment to immediate work groups) have different effects on perceived work group perfor-
mance relative to employee perceptions of department-level TFL (top department leaders), climate
32 BRIMHALL

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT