In Search of Ethics Infrastructure in U.S. Local Governments: Building Blocks or Dead End?

Published date01 November 2023
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1177/00953997231190571
AuthorTansu Demir,Christopher G. Reddick,Bruce J. Perlman
Date01 November 2023
Subject MatterArticles
https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997231190571
Administration & Society
2023, Vol. 55(10) 1866 –1892
© The Author(s) 2023
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/00953997231190571
journals.sagepub.com/home/aas
Article
In Search of Ethics
Infrastructure in U.S.
Local Governments:
Building Blocks or
Dead End?
Tansu Demir1, Christopher G. Reddick1,
and Bruce J. Perlman2
Abstract
The literature in public administration has advanced various propositions
to promote ethical behavior. Local governments have undertaken various
efforts in that direction. Those efforts are considered critical for building
ethical leadership and culture in the long run. Based on a literature review
and use of Social Learning Theory, we identify four building blocks of an
ethics infrastructure for public organizations. Employing a comprehensive
survey of local governments, this paper shows that displaying awareness
and knowledge of ethics, enforcing rules and norms, demonstrating policy
support for ethical behavior, and incentivizing the right behaviors are key
building blocks of ethics infrastructure that still need improvement in local
governments. The reality of ethics infrastructure revealed by the survey is
far from the idealism promoted in the literature. We discuss the results and
offer several insights and remedies.
1The University of Texas at San Antonio, USA
2University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA
Corresponding Author:
Tansu Demir, Department of Public Administration, College for Health, Community, and
Policy, The University of Texas at San Antonio, 501 W. Cesar E. Chavez Blvd., San Antonio,
TX 78207, USA.
Email: Tansu.Demir@utsa.edu
1190571AAS0010.1177/00953997231190571Administration & SocietyDemir et al.
research-article2023
Demir et al. 1867
Keywords
ethics, ethics infrastructure, local governments, survey research
Introduction
Contrary to what may be thought, the U.S. public sector still suffers from a
high risk of misbehavior and corruption by officials in public agencies. For
example, the national Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Public Integrity section
compiles data regarding public corruption convictions in each state, and its
report shows that high rates of misconduct continue to be an issue in govern-
ment that needs to be addressed. Despite increasing awareness and targeted
efforts such as comprehensive ethics legislation and training at all levels of
government, researchers still note that problems such as reactive approaches,
an overly legalistic focus on ethics training and programs, and a lack of con-
sistency across governments continue to plague the effectiveness of these
initiatives (Bowman & Knox, 2008).
Our study analyzes a comprehensive dataset of local governments’ ethics
initiatives in the United States. Our review of the literature suggests four
building blocks that make up an ethics infrastructure. We explore survey data
to see how the reality of an ethics infrastructure corresponds to the ideal pre-
scriptions promoted in the literature.
The paper is organized into five main sections. The first section is a brief
introduction to the notion of organizational infrastructure. The second section
is a review of literature that presents and clarifies the key concepts of ethics
culture, ethical leadership, ethical programs, and social learning theory on
which our model is based. In the third section, we articulate and derive the four
building blocks of ethics infrastructure tested in our survey. In section four, we
present our data analysis to compare the ideal of an ethics infrastructure from
the literature with the reality of local governments as reported in the survey. In
the fifth section, we discuss the findings from our analysis and offer additional
insights and suggestions.
An Ethics Infrastructure for Local Government?
An organization’s infrastructure is the structure and systems – such as
finance, compensation, measurement, reporting, and knowledge creation
and accumulation–that enable it to carry out its initiatives (Dixon & Lokus,
2013). It has been suggested that organizational infrastructure is the foun-
dation for organizational effectiveness and adaptation (Lev, 2002). Some
organizational capabilities (for example, continuous improvement) have

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT