How Can the Battle Be Averted? An Introduction

Date01 December 2016
Published date01 December 2016
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21188
C R Q, vol. 34, no. 2, Winter 2016 113
© 2016 Association for Conf‌l ict Resolution and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) • DOI: 10.1002/crq.21188
GUEST EDITORS’ INTRODUCTION
How Can the Battle Be Averted? An Introduction
Katia Fach Gómez
M anuel A. mez
T he last two decades have witnessed an upsurge in the promotion and
use of international arbitration mainly for commercial and investment
disputes. Arbitration is not new. In fact, its existence preceded the modern
states, including their courts, and the rest of the of‌f‌i cial legal system.  ere
is evidence of arbitration having been used as early as 2250 BC (Fan 2013 ),
and certain trading groups and merchant communities have relied almost
exclusively on private arbitration for centuries (Gómez 2013 ). Over time,
both domestic and international arbitration became promoted and insti-
tutionalized by multilateral organizations like the World Bank (WB) and
the Inter-American Development Bank (IADB), which led to its further
expansion throughout the world. Most of the promotion ef‌f orts occurred
during the 1990s when the WB, IADB, and similar entities included arbi-
tration and other alternative dispute resolution mechanisms as key compo-
nents of their judicial reform agendas, and required borrowing countries
to modernize their legislation to incorporate them.  e institutionalization
of arbitration has happened through the enactment of statutes and rules
governing dif‌f erent aspects of arbitration and the launching of arbitration
centers.
At the forefront of this global development—at least in the commercial
realm—is the Paris-based International Court of Arbitration of the Inter-
national Chamber of Commerce (ICC Arbitration Court), which by 2015
had a case portfolio worth US$286 billion. Since its establishment in 1923,
the ICC Arbitration Court has managed more than twenty thousand cases
involving parties and arbitrators from more than 190 countries.  ere are
other arbitral institutions with tradition in the United States, Europe, Asia,

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT