FIFTY-FOURTH SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY ON COMPUTERS, TECHNOLOGY AND THE LAW: (January 2022 through December 2022).

Part 2 of 2

King F. Tsang & Jyh-An Lee, The Ping-Pong Olympics of Antisuit Injunction in FRAND Litigation, 28 MICH. TECH. L. REV. 305 (2022).

Sean S. Tu & Mark A. Lemley, What Litigators Can Teach the Patent Office About Pharmaceutical Patents, 99 WASH. U. L. REV. 1753 (2022).

Saurabh Vishnubhakat, Patent Inconsistency, 97 IND. L.J. 59 (2022).

7.1.1 SOFTWARE PATENT

Muhammad Z. Abbas, Patent Law and 3D Printing Applications in Response to COVID-19: Exceptions to Investor Rights, 25 J. WORLD INTELL. PROP. 317 (2022).

Lukas R. Goncalves, Preserving the Right of Access to Copyrighted Works Based on Data Regulation, 25 J. WORLD INTELL. PROP. 714 (2022).

Mohommad T. Islam & Azhar Bhuiyan, Dealing with the Mailbox Dilemma: Tryst with TRIPS and Bangladesh's Pharmeceutical Patent Law, 12 QUEEN MARY J. OF INTELL. PROP. 376 (2022).

Tae Yeon Kim, Artificial Intelligence Patent Infringement: Applying the Respondeat Superior Doctrine, 31 FED. CIR. B. J. 325 (2022).

Sharon B. Ziv et al., Where the Gender Gap Meets Academic Patenting: An Empirical Study, 18 OHIO ST. TECH L.J. 239 (2022).

7.1.2 BIOTECH PATENT

Jonathan A. Bell, Note, Generic Drugs and the Future of "Skinny Labels", 35 HARV. J. L. & TECH. 659 (2022).

Jonathan A. Bell, Note, Patent Prophylaxis: Expanding Access to PrEP through 23 U.S.C. Sec. 1498, 63 WM. & MARY L. REV. 2057 (2022).

Marcos Catalan, Fragmentation of Law and Gene Therapy in Human Embryos: A Civil Problem of Biolaw, 36 REV. JUST. DIREITO 30 (2022). Index 10.4."FON" Giani Burtet & Cristiani Fontanela, The Management of Intellectual Property Rights: Analysis of Technology-Based Incubators in the State of Santa Catarina, 36 REV. JUST. DIREITO 300 (2022).

Jordan M. Cowger, Note, Not so Natural Phenomena: A Look at Sec. 101's Impact on Biotech Patents, 50 AIPLA Q. J. 461 (2022).

Lowri Davies, Enhancing Access to Medicines: Interpreting Exceptions to Patent Rights in Article 30 TRIPS, 19 MANCHESTER J. INT'L ECON. L. 173 (2022).

Kirsten E. Fehlan, Note, Does Size Matter? Nanoscale Particle Size as an Indicator of Inherency in Nanopharmaceutical Patent Validity, 38 GA. ST. UNIV. L. REV. 1057 (2022).

Robin Feldman, Captive Generics: The Wolf in Sheep's Clothing, 59 HARV. J. ON LEGIS. 383 (2022).

Marcos V. C. Feres, Biodiversity, Traditional Knowledge and Patent Rights: The Case Study of Phvllomedusa Bicolor, 18 DlREITO GV L. REV. 1 (2022).

Katarina Foss-Solbrekk, Note, The Divisional Game: Using Procedural Rights to Impede Generic/Biosimilar Market Entry, 53 INT'L REV. INDUS. PROP. COPYRIGHT L. 1007 (2022).

Sue A. Ganske, Anthrex and Minerva Surgical: The U.S. Supreme Court Issues Two Patent Decisions in 2021, 32 ALBANY L.J. SCI & TECH. 1 (2022).

Careen Ghazal, The U.S. Drug Price Impasse: Regulation, Innovation, and Public Health, 22 HOUS. J. HEALTH & POL'Y 275 (2022).

Daniel Gonzalez, Comment, The Use of Ultra Long Patent Terms to Incentivize the Development of Novel Antibiotics, 21 HOUS. J. HEALTH & POL'Y 269 (2022).

Rachel Goode & Bernard Chao, Biological Patent Thickets and Delayed Access to Biosimilars, an American Problem, 9 J. L. & BIOSCIENCES, July-December 2022, at 1.

Mitja Kovac & Lana Rakovec, The COVID-19 Pandemic and Long-Term Incentives for Developing Vaccines: Patent Law Under Stress, 25 J. WORLD INTELL. PROP. 292 (2022).

Johnathon Liddicoat et al., Repositioning Generic Drugs: Empirical Findings and Policy Implications, 53 INT'L REV. INDUS. PROP. COPYRIGHT L. 1287 (2022).

Mason Marks & Glenn I. Cohen, Patents on Psychedelics: The Next Legal Battlefront of Drug Development, 135 HARV. L. REV. F. 212 (2022).

Duncan Matthews et al., Balancing Innovation, 'Ordre Public' and Morality in Human Germline Editing: A Call for More Nuanced Approaches in Patent Law, 29 EUR. J. HEALTH L. 562 (2022).

Aisling McMahon & Edana Richardson, Patents, Healthcare and Engaged Shareholders: A Pathway to Encourage Socially Responsible Patent Use?, 42 LEGAL STUD. 271 (2022).

Meshandren Naidoo & Donrich W. Thaldar, Clearing the CRISPR Patent Landscape: Towards a Solution for South America, 139 S. AFR. L.J. 365 (2022).

Alexander Naum, Generic Biologics: A Pathway to Increasing Access to Lifesaving Medicine, 17 HEALTH & POL'Y BRIEF 1 (2022).

Lisa Orucevic, Note, A Machete for the Patent Thicket: Using Noerr-Pennington Doctrine's Sham Exception to Challenge Abusive Patent Tactics by Pharmaceutical Companies, 75 VAND. L. REV. 277 (2022).

Humna Sohail & Samina Bashir, The Clash Between Public Interest and Private Interest: A Critical Analysis of Intellectual Propertv Rights in the Vaccine Context, 9 LUMS L.J. 53 (2022).

Chorong Song, Note, How Non-Product-Specific Manufacturing Patents Block Biosimilars, 71 DUKE L.J. 1923 (2022).

S. Sean Tu et al., Overqualified and Underrepresented: Gender Inequality in Pharmaceutical Patent Law, 48 BYU L. REV. 137 (2022).

7.2 SOFTWARE COPYRIGHT

7.2.0 GENERAL

Stephen Collins, Copyright and Folklore in Ghana: A Question of National Treatment, 12 QUEEN MARY J. OF INTELL. PROP. 9 (2022).

German D. Florez Acero et al., Colombian Assignment of Copyright: A Parasignatic Case, 12 QUEEN MARY J. OF INTELL. PROP. 288 (2022).

Abraham Drassinower, Remarks on Technological Neutrality in Copyright Law as a Subject Matter Problem: Lessons from Canada, 81 CAMBRIDGE L. REV. 50 (2022).

Liesl A. Eschbach, Note, Do You Hear What I Hear?: The Inequities in Substantial Similarity Tests for Musical Copyright Infringement Cases, 11 BERKELEY J. ENT. & SPORTS L. 71 (2022).

Michael P. Goodyear, Synchronizing Copyright and Technology: A New Paradigm for Sync Rights, 87 Mo. L. REV. 95 (2022).

S. Jarjiker, Is South African Copyright Law out of Fashion? The Problem with Section 15(3A) of The Copyright Act 1978, J. S. AFR.L. 213(2022).

Amit K. Jha & Priyanka Rajanm, Software Protection and Software Piracy, 25 J. WORLD INTELL. PROP. 251 (2022).

Peter Lee, Autonomy, Copyright, and Structures of Creative Production, 83 OHIO ST. L.J. 283 (2022).

Daryl Lim, Life after Google v. Oracle: Three Reflections on a Theme, 12 IP THEORY 1 (2022).

Ioan-Radu Motoarca, Farewell to Nichols: Property Ascription and Fictional Character Copyright, 12 QUEEN MARY J. OF INTELL. PROP. 26 (2022).

Okubor C. Nwachukwu & Omonemu E. Tony, Role of Copyright Institutions and Enforcement Agencies in the Digital and Online Dissemination of Copyright Works, 13 BEIJING L. REV. 594 (2022).

Caroline Oliver, Note, A Musical Cue for Fashion: How Compulsory Licenses and Sampling Can Shape Fashion Design Copyright, 19 NW. J. TECH. & INTELL. PROP. 219 (2022).

Mary K. Raczka, Joyriding with Peloton: How Virtual Fitness Classes Can Violate Federal Copyright Law, 29 JEFFREY S. MOORAD SPORTS L.J. 119 (2022).

Cody Rei-Anderson, Copyright, Podcasts and Crowdfunding: An 'Abundance Model' for an Emerging Medium?, 12 QUEEN MARY J. OF INTELL. PROP. 185 (2022).

Daxton R. Stewart, Rise of the Copyleft Trolls: When Photographers Sue after Creative Commons Licenses Go Awry, 18 OHIO ST. TECH L.J. 333 (2022).

7.2.1 USER INTERFACE

7.2.2 FAIR USE

Yang Gao et al., Research on the Dilemma and Improvement of The Copyright Fair Use Doctrine Related to Machine Learning in China, 22 UIC REV. INTELL. PROP. L. 1 (2022).

Justin Hughes, The Sub Rosa Rules of Copyright Fair Use, 64 ARIZ. L. REV. 1 (2022).

Layla G. Maurer, Name, Gamertag, Image, & Likeness: Compensating Collegiate Esports Players Post-Alston, 25 U. DENV. SPORTS & ENT. L.J. 84 (2022).

M. P. R. Mohan & Aditya Gupta, Right to Research and Copyright Law: From Photocopying to Shadow Libraries, 11 N.Y.U INTELL. PROP. & ENT. L. 3 (2022).

Gary Myers, Muddy Waters: Fair Use Implications of Google LLC v. ORacle America, In., 19 Nw. J. TECH. & INTELL. PROP. 155 (2022).

Tyler T. Ochoa, Reconciling Copyright "Restoration" for Pre-1972 Foreign Sound Recordings with the Classics Protection and Access Act, 12 IP THEORY 1 (2022).

Arnold Owusu, Note, Updating the Section 230 Safe Harbor Provision in a New Age of Social Media Platforms, 32 DEPAUL J. ART TECH. & INTELL. PROP. L. 77 (2022).

Justine Pileggi, Google v. Oracle: A Comment and Call to Action, 46 CAN.-U.S. L.J. 272 (2022).

Claire Price, Comment, Google v. Oracle: The Recent Supreme Court Decision, How It Highlights the Inadequacies of Shoehorning New Technology into Intellectual Property Law, and Possible Solutions, 32 DEPAUL J. ART TECH. & INTELL. PROP. L. 93 (2022).

Alyssa Weitkamp, Note, Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith, 32 DEPAUL J. ART TECH. & INTELL. PROP. L. 123 (2022).

Michelle M. Wu, Restoring the Balance of Copyright: Antitrust, Misuse, and Other Possible Paths to Challenge Inequitable Licensing Practices, 114 L. LIBR. J. 131 (2022).

7.2.3 VIDEOGAME

B.J. Ard, Creativity Without IP? Vindication and Challenges in the Video Game Industry, 79 WASH. & LEE L. REV. 1285 (2022).

Yaseli Arellano, Level Up: The Use of Video Games in Healthcare, 23 DEPAUL J. HEALTH CARE L. 1 (2022).

Gabriella V. Coffield, Comment, Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.: An Epic Opinion for Software Developers, 31 U. MIA. BUS. L. REV. 90 (2022).

Dakota Foster, Comment, Protecting Video Game Gameplay Creators: A Two-Pronged Copyright Approach, 9 TEX. A&M L. REV. 711 (2022).

Justin Hughes, Joined Cases C-682/18 and C-683/18 Peterson v. Google & YouTube and Elsevier v. Cyando (C.J.E.U.), 61 INT'L. LEGAL MATERIALS 453 (2022).

Jamie Hwang, Note, Cheating in E-Sports: A Proposal to Regulate the Growing Problem of E-Doping, 116 Nw. U. L. REV. 1283 (2022).

Michael Wang, Original Idea or Illegal Copying? Video Game Copying in China and Its Effect on the U.S. Video Game Industry, Future Steps for U.S. Developers and Publishers, 38 SANTA CLARA HIGH TECH. L.J. 215 (2022).

Chin Yang, Saving Your Games: A Case for the Copyright Protection of Gameplay, 32 AUSTL. INTELL. PROP. J. (2022).

7.3 DIGITAL COPYRIGHT

7.3.0 GENERAL

Klaus D. Beiter et al., Copyright Reform in South Africa: Two Joint Academic Opinions on the Copyright Amendment Bill [B13B-2017], 25 POTCHEFSTROOM ELEC. L.J., June 2022, at 1.

Marcel...