Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal

Issue Number

Latest documents

• FORTY-NINTH SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY ON COMPUTERS, TECHNOLOGY, AND THE LAW.
• DOES THE VIDEO PRIVACY PROTECTION ACT PROTECT USERS OF FREE CELL PHONE APPLICATIONS?
• WAS DIEHR A FLOOK IN THE SYSTEM? A SYSTEMS ANALYSIS FOR TWO LANDMARK PATENT ELIGIBILITY SUPREME COURT DECISIONS.
• TRANSPARENCY REPORTS AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE ESPIONAGE ACT.
• "OUR IDENTITY IS OFTEN WHAT'S TRIGGERING SURVEILLANCE": HOW GOVERNMENT SURVEILLANCE OF #BLACKLIVESMATTER VIOLATES THE FIRST AMENDMENT FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION.
• USING TECHNOLOGY TO DISCOVER MORE ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM.
• REGULATING ONLINE MARKETPLACE LENDING: TO BE A BANK OR NOT TO BE A BANK?
• ONE-TO-ONE OR SLIM TO NONE: NEW JERSEY'S CHANCES OF AFFORDING A ONE-TO-ONE EDUCATIONAL INITIATIVE.
• WHERE THE SIDEWALK ENDS AND ROBOTS DELIVER: SETTING A FRAMEWORK FOR REGULATING PERSONAL DELIVERY DEVICES.
• CLOUD COMPUTING AND CROSS-BORDER TRANSFER PRICING: IMPLICATIONS OF RECENT OECD AND AUSTRALIAN TRANSFER PRICING LAWS ON CLOUD RELATED MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISES AND POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS.

Featured documents

• FORTY-NINTH SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY ON COMPUTERS, TECHNOLOGY, AND THE LAW.
• FORTY- EIGHTH SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY ON COMPUTERS, TECHNOLOGY, AND THE LAW.
• A new era: integrating today's "next gen" research tools Ravel and Casetext in the law school classroom.
• FORTY-SEVENTH SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY ON COMPUTERS, TECHNOLOGY AND THE LAW: (January 2015 through December 2015).
• "OUR IDENTITY IS OFTEN WHAT'S TRIGGERING SURVEILLANCE": HOW GOVERNMENT SURVEILLANCE OF #BLACKLIVESMATTER VIOLATES THE FIRST AMENDMENT FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION.
• Medics, markets, and Medicare.
• DOES THE VIDEO PRIVACY PROTECTION ACT PROTECT USERS OF FREE CELL PHONE APPLICATIONS?
• Privacy, the First Amendment and Hulk Hogan's $140.1 million jury verdict.
• A STEP IN THE WRONG DIRECTION: THE CASE FOR RESTRAINING THE EXTRATERRITORIAL APPLICATION OF THE STORED COMMUNICATIONS ACT.
• FROM INTERNET TROLLS TO SEASONED HACKERS: PROTECTING OUR FINANCIAL INTERESTS FROM DISTRIBUTED-DENIAL-OF-SERVICE ATTACKS.