Faith-Based Organizations, Charitable Choice, And Government
Author | Patricia A. Wilson |
DOI | 10.1177/0095399702250343 |
Published date | 01 March 2003 |
Date | 01 March 2003 |
Subject Matter | Articles |
10.1177/0095399702250343ARTICLEADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY / March 2003Wilson / FAITH-BASED ORGANIZATIONS
FAITH-BASED ORGANIZATIONS,
CHARITABLE CHOICE, AND
GOVERNMENT
PATRICIA A. WILSON
San Diego State University
This article discusses the positive and negativeaspects of “charitable choice.”Although the
author challenges the validity of the “separation of Church and State” argument against
charitable choice,perhaps the most popular argument against this concept is that it violates
the separation of Church and State principles. On the other hand, the greatestvalue of the
charitablechoice concept is its inclusion of diversity and the resulting governmental respon-
siveness because of such diversity. The American public is becoming morediverse, and in
turn, social issues concerning various communities are becoming morecomplex. In such an
environment, a rich variety of inputs fromdiverse groups should be encouraged by public
agencies. No one single entity (not government, education, or business)can solve all society
problemsalone. The WHOLE community—faith-based organizations, education, and public
and private agencies, together— must all play a rolein finding solutions and committing to
action.
Keywords: faith-based initiative; community organizing; church and government
partnerships
The American public is becoming more diverse,and in turn, social issues
concerning various communities are becoming more complex. In such an
environment, a rich variety of inputs from diverse groups should be
encouraged by public agencies. No one, single entity (not government,
education, or business) can solveall society problems alone. The WHOLE
community—faith-based organizations, education, public and private
agencies, together—must all play a role in finding solutions and commit-
ting to action.
President Bush’s advocacy for the “charitable choice” concept
addresses partnerships between faith-based and governmental organiza-
tions. This article, first, defines and describes faith-based initiatives and
29
ADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY, Vol. 35 No. 1, March 2003 29-51
DOI: 10.1177/0095399702250343
© 2003 Sage Publications
charitable choice, and gives a brief historical perspective of these con-
cepts. Following the definition and background information is a discus-
sion of the possible opportunities for faith-based and government partner-
ships that would be greatly enhanced by the Charitable Choice concept.
The next section presents the negative considerations associated with the
charitable choice concept. Examples of two government innovations that
have successfully implemented such partnerships are then presented. The
final section presents a participatory action research model, which dem-
onstrates how faith-based organizations/programs in partnership with
governmental organizations can help with the delivery of services and
taxes, as well as with other solutions to major problems in the society.
FAITH-BASED INITIATIVES AND CHARITABLE CHOICE
Soon after President Bush took office in January 2001, he launched a
major drive to provide public funds for churches and other religious min-
istries that provide social assistance for Americans in need. When there
was evidence of social needs in America, Bush wanted his administration
to look first to faith-based programs and community groups, which have
proven their power to save and change lives. He did not simply want the
government to fund the religious activities of anygroup, but when people
of faith provided social services, the government would not discriminate
against them in its competitive distribution of tax dollars. Bush’s faith-
based initiatives represent a central principle that would define his
approach to domestic policy.
In an effort to implement his approximately $8 to $10 billion plan,
Bush created church-state partnerships with a series of policy directives
starting with two executive orders. First, he established the Office of
Faith-Based and Community Initiativesand directed its staff to coordinate
a national effort to expandopportunities for faith-based and other commu-
nity organizations. The second order removed those “bureaucratic barri-
ers” that served as safeguards for old separation of church and state rules,
and regulated public funds for religious groups in the past. President Bush
also established faith-based “centers” in five cabinet-level federal agen-
cies to assist with the work in the White House faith-based office.The five
centers were the Departments of Justice, Housing and Urban Develop-
ment, Health and Human Services, Labor, and Education. Under the plan,
financial assistance would be provided to fund faith-based services in the
30 ADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY / March 2003
To continue reading
Request your trial