Exploring a model of servant leadership, empowerment, and commitment in nonprofit organizations

Date01 September 2018
AuthorHoward M. Crowson,Gia R. Tatone,Bruce E. Winston,Stuart Allen
Published date01 September 2018
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21311
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Exploring a model of servant leadership,
empowerment, and commitment in nonprofit
organizations
Stuart Allen
1
| Bruce E. Winston
2
| Gia R. Tatone
1
| Howard M. Crowson
3
1
Department of Organizational Leadership, Robert
Morris University, Moon Township, Pennsylvania
2
School of Business & Leadership, Regent
University, Virginia Beach, Virginia
3
Department of Educational Psychology,
Oklahoma State University, Norman, Oklahoma
Correspondence
Stuart Allen, Robert Morris University, 6001
University Boulevard, Moon Township, PA
15108-2574.
Email: allens@rmu.edu
This study examined a model of servant leadership's rela-
tionship to organizational commitment through structural
and psychological empowerment, focusing on leader
follower dyads in a nonprofit organization. Survey data
was collected from 128 employees of a nonprofit organi-
zation in a northeastern U.S. city. After model re-specifi-
cation, a well-fitting model emerged, indicating that
structural empowerment mediates the relationship between
servant leadership and organizational commitment. More-
over, the model suggests that structural empowerment's
effect on organizational commitment is both direct and
indirectthe latter occurring through the meaning dimen-
sion of psychological empowerment. This study provides
initial support for structural empowerment being a mecha-
nism through which servant leadership impacts organiza-
tional commitment in nonprofits. In addition, the role of
meaningful work is highlighted as an antecedent to organi-
zational commitment for nonprofit employees. Servant
leaders are suggested to create structurally empowering
working environments, which support employees' stronger
commitment to the organization.
KEYWORDS
nonprofit organizations, organizational commitment,
psychological empowerment, servant leadership,
structural empowerment
1|INTRODUCTION
Nonprofit organizations face many unique leadership challenges (Herman, 2016), such as pressure
in recent decades to be more efficient and businesslike(Suarez, 2010, p. 696), necessitating
Received: 23 April 2017 Revised: 7 February 2018 Accepted: 14 February 2018
DOI: 10.1002/nml.21311
Nonprofit Management and Leadership. 2018;29:123140.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/nml © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 123
substantial strategic and operational changes. Although effective nonprofit leadership shares charac-
teristics with the public and private sectors (Akingbola, 2013; Ronquillo, Hein, & Carpenter, 2012),
nonprofit organizations require an unique leadership approach as a result of reliance on donations
and volunteers, emphasis on mission over profit, lower salaries and limited resources, competition
with other sectors for talented leaders, among other factors (Herman, 2016; Suarez, 2010; Tidwell,
2005). Servant leadership has received limited attention as a potential leadership style suited to non-
profit organizations (Palumbo, 2016; Ronquillo, 2011) despite its emphasis on mission (Vaill,
1998), suitability to humane and caring organizations (Northouse, 2016), and its follower-centric
approach to achieving organizational objectives (Palumbo, 2016). Van Dierendonck, Stam,
Boersma, de Windt, and Alkema (2014) point to servant leadership's potential to address the new
challenges organizations face, including increased reliance on people within a knowledge-based
economy, which may equally benefit nonprofit organizations (Ronquillo et al., 2012).
Servant leaders are seen as unique because of their focus on service to their followers (Farling,
Stone, & Winston, 1999). Structural empowerment, in the form of information, resources, support,
and opportunities (Laschinger, Finegan, Shamian, & Wilk, 2001), is a possible mechanism through
which servant leaders may create empowering work conditions for their followers. Empowering
work conditions are believed to result in feelings of empowerment (a state of psychological empow-
erment), enhancing followers' perceptions of being able to influence work roles and outcomes
(Lucas, Laschinger, & Wong, 2008; Spreitzer, 1995). More specifically, structural empowerment
may have an effect on nonprofit employees' and volunteers' feelings that their work makes a differ-
ence both in meaning and impact (dimensions of psychological empowerment). Empowered
employees are argued to express a reciprocal commitment to their organizations (Avolio, Zhu,
Koh, & Bhatia, 2004; Wayne, Shore, & Liden, 1997). This resulting organizational commitment is a
positive and desirable outcome for organizations, including nonprofits (Vecina, Chacón, Marzana, &
Marta, 2013), associated with additional outcomes such as satisfaction with the organization, job sat-
isfaction, motivation, organization-related extra-role behavior, intentions to stay, work performance,
and lower absenteeism (Mathieu & Zajac, 1990; Riketta & Van Dick, 2005; Solinger, Van Olffen, &
Roe, 2008).
Servant leadership's positive relationship with organizational commitment has been reported in
multiple studies (Parris & Peachey, 2012). Positive relationships have also been found between ser-
vant leadership and structural empowerment (Van Winkle, Allen, De Vore, & Winston, 2014), and
servant leadership and the meaning dimension of psychological empowerment (Asag-Gau & Van
Dierendonck, 2011). However, these variables have not been explored in a single model examining
the mechanisms through which servant leadership may contribute to increased organizational com-
mitment through increased structural and psychological empowerment. Responding to Ronquillo's
(2011) call for further research on servant leadership in nonprofits, this study examines the research
question: What is the mediating role of structural and psychological empowerment in the relation-
ship between supervisors' servant leadership behaviors and followers' commitment to their nonprofit
organization?
2|LITERATURE AND CONCEPTUAL MODEL
2.1 |Servant leadership
Servant leadership has received growing interest from leadership practitioners and researchers
(Parris & Peachey, 2012), including nonprofit scholars (Palumbo, 2016; Ronquillo et al., 2012).
124 ALLEN ET AL.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT