Expecting the Unexpected: Cultural Components of Arab Governance

AuthorLawrence Rosen
Published date01 January 2006
Date01 January 2006
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1177/0002716205282329
Subject MatterArticles
10.1177/0002716205282329THE ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMYEXPECTING THE UNEXPECTED January603
The development of democracy in the Arab world does
not always pay sufficient attention to the cultural foun-
dations of Arab political and social life. Concepts of the
person, time, memory, and relationship need to be con-
sidered as vital elements of the political cultures of these
countries. Against that background, it may be possible to
suggest elements of constitutional and legal organization
that are more in keeping with Arab cultural orientations,
rather than supposing that the imposition of Western
constitutional forms will necessarily suit local needs in
the Middle East.
Keywords: democracy; Arabs; Middle East;
constitutionalism
Discussions about governance in the Arab
world tend to revolve around the prospects
for democracy. One of several models tends to
dominate these discussions. Either it is assumed
that an electoral model based on competing
political parties must cast up leaders whose
legitimacy stems from the process itself, or a
middle class must develop whose eagerness to
affect the distribution of power coincides with
those enlightened self-interests and unseen
market forces that conduce toward representa-
tive government. It is not that these models lack
merit but that they tend to exist in a partial cul-
tural vacuum. To understand the relation of
democratic forms and contemporary Arab polit-
ical life it may, therefore, be useful to explore
some aspects of Arab culture more broadly con-
ANNALS, AAPSS, 603, January 2006 163
Lawrence Rosen is William Nelson Cromwell Professor
of Anthropology at Princeton University and an adjunct
professor of law at Columbia Law School. As an anthro-
pologist, he has worked mainly in North Africa; as a law-
yer,he has concentrated on the rights of indigenous peo-
ples and American family law. Named to the first group
of MacArthur Award winners, he has held visiting
appointments at Oxford and Cambridge Universities
and been named a Carnegie Corporation Scholar and
fellow of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for
Scholars. His books include Bargaining For Reality
(1984), The Anthropology of Justice (1989), The Justice
of Islam (2000), The Culture of Islam (2002), and Law as
Culture (in press).
DOI: 10.1177/0002716205282329
Expecting the
Unexpected:
Cultural
Components
of Arab
Governance
By
LAWRENCE ROSEN
ceived and to consider how they interact with the forms of governance that have
been developing.
I come at these issues as both an anthropologist and a lawyer. While some schol-
ars seek to derive, by historic or contemporary comparison, the “foundations” of a
given political form like democracy, the approach of an anthropologist like myself,
while not overtly “antifoundational,” is more concerned with the ways in which
seemingly unconnected social and cultural factors may contribute to the develop-
ment and perpetuation of a particular political pattern. Thus, among the features I
want to consider are the ways in which concepts of person and time affect the idea
of power,the nature of reciprocity and ingratiation in the development of bonds of
obligation and institutionalized ways for leveling difference, and the relation
between Arab concepts of chaos and their views of the moral/religious underpin-
nings of human nature. As a legal scholar I am, in addition, interested in the ways in
which cultural assumptions inform the institutions through which power is distrib-
uted and differences addressed. I will, therefore, with full recognition that these
themes vary considerably in different parts of the Arab world, try to show how such
cultural concepts and institutional forms are vital to any understanding of Arab
governance and how they may be drawn upon in fashioning culturally responsive
constitutions.
Cultural Components of Arab Social Life
In the Arab world, it may be argued, a person is primarily identified in terms of
his or her network of obligations. Envisioning the world as a terrain for interper-
sonal negotiation—and supported by the Islamic view that central to human
nature and divine injunction is the need to govern one’s passions with reason—the
individual is largely defined by the ability to marshal dependencies and overcome
opponents on behalf of himself and those with whom interdependent ties have
been formed. Because the community of believers constitutes the broader unit
within which one operates and one’slocal community is its everyday manifestation,
to fabricate a network of associations is to connect one’s own actions with a world
whose universal vision of humankind and its proper organization appear both true
and natural. Successful construction of a network of dependents thus implies both
self-mastery and worldly effect. As elements of the cultural paradigm emerge in
distinctive contexts, the synergistic quality of each upon the whole reinforces the
sense of a universe that is both orderly and consonant with the structure estab-
lished by God. Consider some of the specific cultural correlates through which this
pattern is expressed.
By contrast to the West, where property is primarily seen as the relation of a per-
son to things, in the Arab world the emphasis is more clearly on ownership as a
focus of the relations between persons as they concern things. Moreover, it is vital
that a man be able to move freely, forming attachments wherever they prove most
advantageous. To be tied up is, both metaphorically and literally, to be unmanned,
indeed to be rendered less than fully human. Rituals may heighten this emphasis:
164 THE ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT