Examining the characteristics and managerial challenges of professional services: An empirical study of management consultancy in the travel, tourism, and hospitality sector

AuthorRohit Verma,Matthew C. Walsman,Alistair Brandon‐Jones,Michael Lewis
Published date01 March 2016
Date01 March 2016
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2016.03.007
Examining the characteristics and managerial challenges of
professional services: An empirical study of management consultancy
in the travel, tourism, and hospitality sector
Alistair Brandon-Jones
a
,
*
, Michael Lewis
a
, Rohit Verma
b
, Matthew C. Walsman
b
a
Bath School of Management, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, Somerset, UK
b
School of Hotel Administration, Cornell University, 338 Statier Hall, Ithaca, NY, USA
article info
Article history:
Available online 2 April 2016
Accepted by Mikko Ketokivi
Keywords:
Professional service rms
Professional service operations
management (PSOM)
Empirical research
Mixed-method data
Consultancy
Travel, tourism, and hospitality
Contingency
abstract
This paper nds that OM's one-size-ts-allcharacterization of professional services, namely high levels
of customer engagement, extensive customization, knowledge intensity, and low levels of capital in-
tensity, does not hold when carrying out a deep dive(to the best of our knowledge, a rst in this area of
OM) into consultancy in the US travel, tourism, and hospi tality sector. We analyse mixed-method data
(semi-structured interviews, focus groups, and a besteworst choice experimental survey) and observe
that consultancy can actually be quite remote and passive and that any periods of face-to-face
engagementwill typically be time limited and focused on specic project phases. Moreover, and
further conrming the value of a study that allowed us to investigate professional service operations in a
specic market context, our data suggest this may often be at the behest of the client. The signicant
variation observed in levels of customization we interpret as con rming Maister's (1993) notion of a
portfolio of brains,grey hair, and procedural work. We also observed relatively high levels of capital in-
tensity; reecting perhaps the vintage of most OM characterizations and the dramatic ICT-related
changes that have occurred in all business operations in the last 20 years. The work also demonstrates
the necessity of a more contingent perspective on PSOM. We assess the impact of both rm (scale,
specialization) and individual level (leverage) characteristics to demonstrate signicant variation within
what might be expected to be a relatively homogenous group of professional service operations. For
example, investigating the effects of specialization (via a typology of consulting operations: super-
specialists, generalists, deep knowledge traders, deep market knowledge traders) revealed that rela-
tive degree of interaction may be dependent upon degree of expertise, such that it was the super-spe-
cialists in our sample that spent less time with clients and the more generalist rms who were
complementing their limited expert status with high levels of interaction (networking, etc.).
©2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND
license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
1. Introduction
Within the, albeit limited (Machuca et al., 2007; Hopp et al.,
2009), professional service operations management (PSOM) liter-
ature generic conceptual perspectives predominate. All profes-
sionaloperations ebe they accountants, advertising agencies,
architects, design engineers, doctors, executive recruiters, fashion
designers, insurance brokers, investment bankers, lawyers,
management consultants, media producers, R&D laboratories,
software providers, social work agencies and universities eare
presumed to exhibit certain characteristics. These include high
levels of customer engagement, extensive customization, knowl-
edge intensity, and low levels of capital intensity (Sampson and
Froehle, 2006; Schmenner, 1986; Silvestro et al., 1992). Discus-
sions of shared characteristics may be useful when contrasting
professional services with, for example, mass services. However,
any deeper reection on the literature or review of the limited
number of focused empirical studies highlight signicant variance
in the clients, professionals, bodies of knowledge, regulatory en-
vironments, and competitive landscapes, across different profes-
sional settings. Equally, although in some settings it may be
*Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: A.Brandon-Jones@bath.ac.uk (A. Brandon-Jones), m.a.lewis@
bath.ac.uk (M. Lewis), rv54@cornell.edu (R. Verma), mcw237@cornell.edu
(M.C. Walsman).
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Journal of Operations Management
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jom
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2016.03.007
0272-6963/©2016The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. Thisis an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Journal of Operations Management 42-43 (2016) 9e24
accurate to challenge the effectiveness of standard operating
procedures(Kellogg and Nie, 1995, p.329) and the managerial
metaphor of cat herdingmay indeed resonate (Løwendahl, 2000),
there is limited empirical evidence regarding the specic mana-
gerial challenges that comprise PSOM (Heineke, 1995; Machuca
et al., 2007) and, again, no real reection on the key contin-
gencies that may shape these challenges. Schmenner's (1986)
elaboration of the challenges associated with different service
types provides some interesting points of departure but detailed
questions remain unanswered. What, for example, have the effects
of ubiquitous information and communications technology (ICT),
globalization and outsourcing, or the increased focus on stan-
dardization had on the nature of PSOM (Metters and Verma, 2008).
Given this context, we identied three key research objectives.
First, we wanted to explore the extent to which generic conceptual
characterizations (i.e. high engagement, customization, and
knowledge intensity, and low capital intensity) align with observed
practice. To do so, we decided to narrow our focus to a particular
professional service type, management consultancy.
1
This focused
approach is in line with previous studies. For example, McNeilly
and Barr (2006) studied accounting services when exploring pro-
videreclient relationships, whilst Boone et al. (2008) collected data
in an architectural engineering context to study learning and
knowledge depreciation within the professional services. More-
over, given that a great deal of professional service competitive
advantage relates to and is derived from client/sector insight and
social capital (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998), it was also appropriate
to limit the study setting to a specic client/market space and
correspondingly we selected the US travel, tourism, and hospitality
(TTH) sector.
2
Such an approach inevitably limits the generaliz-
ability of any ndings but given our rst objective is, in essence,
looking to disprove a null hypothesis (i.e. that there is no rela-
tionship between service type and operational characteristics), a
single service type focus is suitable. Furthermore, given that level
of client interactionwas a critical variable under investigation, this
approach allowed us to engage with clients in interviews and focus
groups. Our second objective was to investigate the relative
importance of various managerial challenges in a specic profes-
sional setting and here again the deep diveoffered signicant
advantages; giving us control over a number of key professional
service-related contingencies (i.e. regulations, competitive and
market dynamics, etc.). Finally, our third objective was to begin to
explore some of the other contingencies, including scale, leverage,
and specialization, that, ex-ante, may inuence both operational
characteristics and managerial challenges.
Given the exploratory nature of our research, we adopted a
mixed methods approach, combining semi-structured interviews,a
survey that included a besteworst choice experiment, and a focus
group. The rest of the paper is structured as follows. First, we
provide a synthesis of the literature as the basis for our research
questions. Subsequently, we provide details of our research meth-
odology, including study context, research design, data collection,
and analytical approach. We then present the results of our ana-
lyses in relation to our research questions. Finally, we discuss our
ndings, highlight our contributions and limitations, and suggest
avenues for future research.
2. Literature review and research questions
This section reviews the literature relating to our research ob-
jectives and then uses these insights as the basis for research
questions that structure our empirical investigation. First, we re-
view the characteristics of professional service offerings;
combining reections on the generic/conceptual OM typologies
with specic insights that relate to our chosen empirical focus,
consulting services. Second, we explore the specic challenges that
together comprise PSOM and, third, we reect on the potential
impact of scale, leverage, and specialization as contingent factors
that might inuence the nature of PSOM.
2.1. Characteristics of professional service offerings
Determining the characteristics of a professional service offering
is a signicant rst step in building an understanding of PSOM.
After all, it is the idiosyncrasies of any service type that corre-
spondingly generate its specic managerial challenges. To date, a
great deal of the reection on professional service operations has
been shaped by a series of theoretical/conceptual papers. For
example, if there are high levels of client interaction and custom-
ization in a given professional service this could in turn create
signicant process variability. Similarly, if a professional service is
reliant on high levels of knowledge intensive judgement this will in
turn contribute to both variation and relatively extended process
throughput times (Sasser et al., 1978; Schmenner, 20 04). Finally,
the extent to which professionals in a given service setting adhere
to explicit external codes of ethics and implicit norms that guide
appropriate behaviour (Fischer et al., 2014), reduces the need for,
and associated costs of, internal service quality monitoring
(Goodale et al., 2008), but may also act to minimize the inuence of
operations managers (Harvey, 1990). Here, we examine character-
istics in relation to customer engagement, customization, and
knowledge/capital intensity.
2.1.1. Customer engagement in professional services
Many widely cited service classications (Maister and Lovelock,
1982; Schmenner, 1986; Silvestro et al., 1992; Wemmerlov, 1990)
differentiate professional services from other service types because
of their high level of customer engagement. Although at its
simplest, this characteristic refers tothe extent to which a customer
is present
3
during the delivery of a service (i.e. front rather than
back ofce operations), these typologies are also generally referring
to the relative activityof the interaction (Mersha, 1990; Goodale
et al., 2008). In other words, a professional service is highly inter-
active because it is assumed that there is extensive dialogue be-
tween the client and the provider (Kelloggand Nie,1995; Frey et al.,
2013;Fischer et al., 2014), where both the service requirements and
service package are discussed and designed. It is also asserted that
these high engagement service operations allow the customer/
client to actively intervene with their service processes (Verma,
2000), often to request modications to what is being delivered.
Given the implication that such high engagement causes a reduc-
tion in efciency (Chase, 1981) there is, at least in part, an assumed
increase in commercial pressure (Schilling et al., 2012) and a
growing belief that high levels of customer participation in the
creation of professional service offerings may be a double-edged
sword(Chan et al., 2010).
In our chosen service type econsultancy eassumptions relating
1
Management, human resource, IT, and technology consultancy together
generate more than $500 billion annually. Management consulting alone employs
more than 780,000 people in the US.
2
The travel, tourism, and hospitality sector, is one of the largest in the US
economy with a contribution of $1416 billion (8.4% GDP) and more than 14 million
jobs (9.8% of all employment).
3
Of course, the growth in technology-mediated communication means that the
physical presence of the client/provider may no longer be a critical component of
any interactivity (Froehle and Roth, 2004; Ellram et al., 2008).
A. Brandon-Jones et al. / Journal of Operations Management 42-43 (2016) 9e2410

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT