Examining Recovery Status and Supports before and after Substance Abuse Disorder Treatment Among Clients Who Experienced Lifetime and Recent Firearm-Related Threats

AuthorTK Logan,Maggie Schroeder,Jennifer Cole
Date01 July 2022
DOI10.1177/00220426211056601
Published date01 July 2022
Subject MatterArticles
Article
Journal of Drug Issues
2022, Vol. 52(3) 306328
© The Author(s) 2021
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/00220426211056601
journals.sagepub.com/home/jod
Examining Recovery Status and
Supports before and after
Substance Abuse Disorder
Treatment Among Clients
Who Experienced Lifetime and
Recent Firearm-Related
Threats
TK Logan
1
, Jennifer Cole
1
and Maggie Schroeder
2
Abstract
Firearm-related risks have often been overlooked in the sequela of substance use and substance
use disorders. This study compares adult substance abuse disorder treatment (SADT) clients who
experienced recent (n= 274) and lifetime (n= 889) f‌irearm threats to adults who were not
threatened with a f‌irearm (n= 2029) before and 12 months after program entry. More men
experienced f‌irearm threats (38.8%) than women (34.2%). However, among those with any
f‌irearm threats, more women (27.2%) experienced f‌irearm threats in the year before program
entry than men (20.2%). Being threatened with a f‌irearm was associated with increased econo mic
vulnerability, criminal justice system involvement, mental health problems, and victimization both
before and after SADT program entry. A higher number of adverse childhood experiences were
associated with f‌irearm threats and particularly recent f‌irearm threats. Results of this study
underscore the importance of screening for f‌irearm-related risks in substance abuse disorder
treatment programs.
Keywords
gun violence, substance abuse treatment, recovery, f‌irearm-related risks
Firearm-related risks and substance use are often treated independently; however, f‌irearm-related
risks intersect with alcohol and illicit drug use in multiple ways (Branas, Han, & Wiebe, 2016;
1
University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
2
Kentucky Department of Behavioral Health, Developmental and Intellectual Disabilities, Frankfort, KY, USA
Corresponding Author:
TK Logan, Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, 333 Waller Avenue, Suite 480, Lexington, KY 40504,
USA.
Email: tklogan@uky.edu
Buschmann, Prochaska, Baillargeon, & Temple, 2017;Dittmer, Davenport, Oyler, & Bernard,
2021;Lu & Temple, 2020). For example, both impact younger adults (1830 years old) at higher
rates and early involvement in either is associated with negative outcomes in later adulthood
(Everytown for Gun Safety, 2020;Grant et al., 2006;Moss, Chen, & Yi, 2014;Parsons,
Thompson, Vargas, & Roco, 2018;Teplin et al., 2021). Additionally, f‌irearm-related risks
have often been overlooked in the sequela of substance use and substance use disorders (Schulte &
Hser, 2013). Several recent studies have found that one-third to one-half of adults entering
substance abuse disorder treatment (SADT) or residential recovery housing programs have
experienced f‌irearm-related victimization (Logan & Cole, 2021a,2021b). However, no studies to
date have examined SADT outcomes among clients who have experienced f‌irearm victimization.
Firearm victimization has been associated with increased psychological symptoms and
substance use (Boeck, Strong, & Campbell, 2020;Vella et al., 2020). More specif‌ically, several
studies have found that individuals exposed to f‌irearm-related threats had higher emotional
distress and functioning problems than those victimized without a weapon or those victimized
with a weapon other than a f‌irearm (Kagawa et al., 2020;Weigend Vargas & Hemenway, 2021).
Women who experience f‌irearm threats from an abusive intimate partner also report increased
distress compared to women with abusers who did not threaten them with a f‌irearm (Logan &
Cole, 2021;Logan & Lynch, 2018;Logan, Lynch, & Walker, 2021;Logan & Lynch, 2021a;
Lynch & Logan, 2018;Sullivan & Weiss,2017). Several studies have also found that victimization
with a f‌irearm is associated with increased substance use (Farrell & Zimmerman, 2017;Vella et al.,
2020). In addition, research suggests that individuals exposed to f‌irearm threats are at increased
risk of revictimization including revictimization with f‌irearms as well as increased risk of f‌irearm
violence perpetration (Beardslee et al., 2018;Goldstick et al., 2019a;Kalesan, Zuo,
Ramachandran, & Galea, 2019;RowhaniRahbar et al., 2015;Schmidt et al., 2019;Teplin
et al., 2021;Turner, Phillips, Tigri, Williams, & Hartman, 2016;Wallace,2017). One study found
that both men and women who had access to, or were threatened with, a f‌irearm during ado-
lescence were more likely to own a gun, carry a gun in public, perpetrate f‌irearm violence, and to
be threatened with a weapon in adulthood (Teplin et al., 2021).
Although f‌irearm victimization has been associated with prior victimization (Goldstick et al.,
2019b;Logan & Cole, 2021a,2021b;Rajan, Branas, Myers, & Agrawal, 2019;Turner et al., 2016;
Wallace, 2017), there has been limited examination of whether there is an association of adverse
childhood experiences and f‌irearm victimization. One study found that childhood trauma was
associated with f‌irearm violence among homeless youth (Hsu et al., 2021). In general, adverse
childhood experiences have been associated with negative outcomes in adults including poorer
mental health outcomes, suicidality (Hughes et al., 2017;Thompson, Kingree, & Lamis, 2019),
physical health outcomes, and substance use (Hughes et al., 2017;Letendre & Reed, 2017;
Merrick et al., 2019;Petruccelli, Davis, & Berman, 2019) as well as economic vulnerability in
adulthood (Merrick, Ford, Ports, & Guinn, 2018;Merrick et al., 2019). In particular, those
experiencing more adverse childhood experiences had a higher risk of substance use disorders and
other negative mental and physical health outcomes (Boullier & Blair, 2018;Hughes et al., 2017;
Merrick et al., 2019;Waehrer, Miller, Silverio Marques, Oh, & Burke Harris, 2020). This study
expands the literature by examining adverse childhood experiences among adults entering SADT
and whether there are differences in adverse childhood events among clients who have, and clients
who have not, been threatened with a f‌irearm.
Relapse, or return to use of alcohol or illegal drugs, are typically the primary outcome measures
in evaluations of SADT programs (Richardson, Blount, & HansonCook, 2019;White, 2012).
However, recovery extends beyond the use of substances to include enhancements in physical
health, mental well-being, quality of life, and community reintegration, and these goals can often
be met even when there are minor relapses (Kaskutas et al., 2014;Laudet & White, 2008;
Logan et al. 307

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT