England and Wales

AuthorChristopher Hodges
DOI10.1177/0002716208328286
Published date01 March 2009
Date01 March 2009
Subject MatterArticles
ANNALS, AAPSS, 622, March 2009 105
England and Wales have rules on managing multiple
similar claims (the Group Litigation Order) and partic-
ular representative procedures for consumer protec-
tion cases and for competition cases. The competition
procedure permits representative damages claims and
reforms may introduce damages more widely. But the
most interesting feature is the development of over-
sight of collective compensation by public regulatory
authorities and alternative dispute resolution or volun-
tary mechanisms.
Keywords: civil litigation; representative actions; con-
sumer protection; competition enforcement;
Group Litigation Order; collective redress
The Civil Litigation System
This report covers England and Wales: the
separate jurisdictions of Scotland and Northern
Ireland have similar public law provisions but not
collective court procedures.1England and Wales
make up a common law system: the common law
is declared by being applied by judges in a prag-
matic approach to particular problems (Slapper
and Kelly 2006) within a hierarchy of rules, along
with primary and secondary legislation.
Decisions on liability and quantum in civil
cases are made by judges.2Civil procedure is
traditionally adversarial, with the parties con-
trolling the issues in dispute, discovery of doc-
uments (which can be extensive and costly),
production of experts for each side, and strong
emphasis on oral argument at trial. Significant
reforms from 1999 have introduced far greater
judicial control through case management,
however, with court power to limit the numbers
England and
Wales
By
CHRISTOPHER HODGES
Christopher Hodges is head of the CMS Research in
Civil Justice Systems at the Centre for Socio-Legal
Studies, Oxford University.
NOTE: The author gratefully acknowledges the assis-
tance of Dr. Magdalena Tulibacka in researching the
consumer and competition provisions and of Professor
Mark Mildred for comments on the draft.
DOI: 10.1177/0002716208328286

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT