Drink, Share, and Comment; Wait, What Did I Just Do? Understanding Online Alcohol-Related Regret Experiences Among Emerging Adults

DOI10.1177/0022042621994542
Published date01 July 2021
Date01 July 2021
Subject MatterArticles
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022042621994542
Journal of Drug Issues
2021, Vol. 51(3) 442 –460
© The Author(s) 2021
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/0022042621994542
journals.sagepub.com/home/jod
Article
Drink, Share, and Comment;
Wait, What Did I Just Do?
Understanding Online Alcohol-
Related Regret Experiences
Among Emerging Adults
Femke Geusens1,2 and Ilse Vranken1,2
Abstract
This study investigated the causes and coping strategies of regret of sharing alcohol-related
content on social media. Semi-structured interviews were conducted among emerging adults
who experienced regret of having shared either general alcohol references or drunken references
(n = 29, ages 19–25 years, M = 21.38, SD = 1.60). The most important cause of regret was
a disruption of one’s online self-presentation. When delving deeper into the specific causes
of online alcohol-related regret and how this content can disrupt the self-presentation, two
overarching themes emerged: (a) content-related regret, and (b) audience-related regret. When
examining the coping strategies, we found that emerging adults applied different strategies (a) to
minimize their regret (e.g., delete the content), and (b) to avoid future regret (e.g., delete social
media before going out). Implications for prevention are discussed.
Keywords
online regret, social media, alcohol, intoxication, emerging adults
Introduction
Drinking in college is usually engaged in to enhance socialization, bonding, and have disinhib-
ited fun (Colby et al., 2009). Most college students consume alcohol and references to fun
drinking events are often shared on social media such as Facebook or Instagram (Beullens &
Schepers, 2013; Hendriks et al., 2017). Alcohol-related content shared on social media can
have many different forms: Individuals can share textual updates referencing upcoming or
prior drinking events (e.g., “Completely wasted yesterday night”), textual references to alcohol
in general (e.g., “I love champagne”), pictures or video clips in which people are drinking or
holding an alcoholic beverage (e.g., a picture taken at a bar or at a party), pictures or video
clips in which an alcoholic beverage is the focus (e.g., a close-up of a cocktail with a reference
to the nice weather), or pictures or video clips in which alcohol is shown in the background
(e.g., a picture taken during a dinner with a glass of wine on the table). Other examples of
1KU Leuven, Belgium
2Research Foundation Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen), Belgium
Corresponding Author:
Femke Geusens, School for Mass Communication Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, KU Leuven, Parkstraat 45 box
3603, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Email: femke.geusens@kuleuven.be
994542JODXXX10.1177/0022042621994542Journal of Drug IssuesGeusens and Vranken
research-article2021
Geusens and Vranken 443
alcohol-related content are pictures or video clips depicting drinking games (e.g., a picture of
a group of friends playing beer pong), pictures or video clips in which someone is clearly
intoxicated or drunk (e.g., a video clip of friends drunkenly singing), or textual updates (e.g.,
twitter status updates) shared while drunk (Beullens & Schepers, 2013; Cavazos-Rehg et al.,
2015; Hendriks et al., 2017). In general, these examples can be divided in two overarching
types of alcohol-related content: alcohol references and drunken references. Alcohol refer-
ences are defined as textual or visual social media content that shows or refers to alcoholic
beverages, and drunken references are defined as textual or visual social media content that
was shared while drunk, or which depicts people in a drunken state.
Although most alcohol-related content on social media is fairly innocent (i.e., alcohol refer-
ences such as a picture of friends laughing together with glasses of beer on the table in front of
them; Beullens & Schepers, 2013; Hendriks et al., 2017), research has indicated that more than
15% of young individuals share photos or messages on social media while they are intoxicated
(i.e., drunken references; Moreno et al., 2012). Whereas more innocent alcohol references are
often shared without thinking (Hendriks et al., 2017), sharing drunken references appears to be a
deliberate choice (Hebden et al., 2015; Niland et al., 2014). Individuals share drunken references
because it is fun and exciting, and because it heightens the expectations and pleasures of getting
drunk with friends (Hebden et al., 2015; Moewaka Barnes et al., 2016).
It has been posited that sharing these drunken references is at odds with the wider cultural and
policy environment dominated by the idea of risk management (Brown & Gregg, 2012). Societal
norms center around moderate alcohol consumption and strict impression management, espe-
cially online (Brown & Gregg, 2012; Hebden et al., 2015). It has been argued that this is espe-
cially true for young women, who are expected to adhere to beauty and appearance standards tied
to the performance of ideal femininity (Brown & Gregg, 2012). In contrast, getting drunk and
sharing alcohol or drunken references online is deemed risky and a potential source of regret as
it is not in line with societal expectancies (Brown & Gregg, 2012). Regret is an aversive emotion
characterized by “a feeling of sadness, repentance, or disappointment over one’s own actions and
their factual or potential outcomes” (Wang et al., 2011, p. 1). Although Brown and Gregg (2012)
argue that there is too much emphasis on the idea that young people, and especially women, will
regret getting drunk or sharing content on social media, other research has indicated that alcohol
consumption can lead to regret of drinking and related behaviors (Fjær, 2015; Giguère et al.,
2014). One study on Facebook-related regret found that some individuals can experience regret
after sharing alcohol-related content on social media (Wang et al., 2011).
Although regret is an inherently negative emotion (Wang et al., 2011; Zeelenberg & Pieters,
2007), it can also teach young individuals important life lessons (Saffrey et al., 2008; Zeelenberg
& Pieters, 2007). For instance, one of the core propositions of regret regulation theory is that
individuals are motivated to avoid the negative feeling of regret and this regret avoidance influ-
ences behavioral decisions (Pieters & Zeelenberg, 2007; Zeelenberg & Pieters, 2007). One meta-
analysis of anticipated regret in health behaviors found that if individuals anticipated regretting
an action (e.g., drinking too much), their intention to engage in this behavior as well as their
actual engagement in this behavior decreased (Brewer et al., 2016). In contrast, if individuals
anticipated regretting an inaction (e.g., not using a condom), their behavioral intentions and
actual behaviors increased (Brewer et al., 2016). Another meta-analysis testing anticipated regret
as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behavior (TPB), found that anticipated regret
was related to both behavioral intentions and actual behavior, over and above other TPB vari-
ables (Sandberg & Conner, 2008). This shows that regret can be a strong motivator to engage in
more healthy behavior in the future.
The present study will add to the literature on alcohol-related social media use by delving
deeper into the causes and impact of regret caused by online alcohol-related communication.
Although some research exists on either drinking-related regret (Fjær, 2015) or social

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT