Does Public Service Motivation Influence the College Students’ Intention to Work in the Public Sector? Evidence From Korea

DOI10.1177/0734371X13511974
Date01 June 2016
Published date01 June 2016
AuthorGeon Lee,Do Lim Choi
Subject MatterArticles
Review of Public Personnel Administration
2016, Vol. 36(2) 145 –163
© 2013 SAGE Publications
Reprints and permissions:
sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/0734371X13511974
rop.sagepub.com
Article
Does Public Service
Motivation Influence the
College Students’ Intention
to Work in the Public Sector?
Evidence From Korea
Geon Lee1 and Do Lim Choi2
Abstract
Previous studies have produced significant distinctions between public- and private-
sector employees with respect to public service motivation (PSM) and PSM-related
variables. Little, however, is known about whether those variables are associated
with employment choice at a pre-entry level. This article will address this gap in the
literature by exploring the effect of PSM on college students’ sector choice in Korea.
In previous research on PSM, three types of PSM measures—Perry’s PSM scale,
work values, and prosocial behaviors—were utilized as a PSM variable. In exploring
the association between PSM and sector choice, we employed the three measures.
The empirical model showed that PSM and prosocial behaviors were not associated
with public-sector choice. Only job security was found to be a main reason why
college students intended to enter the public sector in Korea. We will discuss the
implications of our findings in this article.
Keywords
public service motivation, recruitment and selection, work motivation
Introduction
Civil service careers in the public sector have become less popular over time in the
United States (Chetkovich, 2003; G. B. Lewis & Frank, 2002). There are many rea-
sons for this: public organizations are negatively portrayed as bureaucratic (Naff &
1Kyonggi University, Suwon, Republic of Korea
2Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
Corresponding Author:
Do Lim Choi, Chungnam National University, 220. Gung-dong, Yu-seong-gu, Daejeon, Korea 305-764.
Email:dmchoi@cnu.ac.kr
511974ROP36210.1177/0734371X13511974Review of Public Personnel AdministrationLee and Choi
research-article2013
146 Review of Public Personnel Administration 36(2)
Crum, 1999), trust in government has declined over time (Perry & Wise, 1990), ben-
efits in public-sector agencies are less than those in private-sector counterparts (Naff
& Crum, 1999), and public employee satisfaction at work has gradually decreased (H.
Lee, Cayer, & Lan, 2006). Nevertheless, what makes certain job seekers consider the
public sector as a career choice? This is an important question in public administration
research. Perry and Wise (1990) answered this question by proposing public service
motivation (PSM) as a unique motivation of job candidates who want to pursue a
career in the public sector. They argued that individuals with a high degree of PSM
tend to seek membership in a public agency. Currently, PSM is considered an impor-
tant theme in public administration and management research (Behn, 1995; Brewer,
Selden, & Facer, 2000; Vandenabeele, 2008). The concept of PSM originates from
“public service ethics” proposed by Buchanan (1975), who argues that public servants
are characterized by a public service ethic: attitudes and behaviors that differentiate
public managers from business managers. A great body of research on motivation of
public employees has been undertaken in the field, and it is well documented that
motivational differences exist between public-sector employees and their private-sec-
tor counterparts (e.g., Crewson, 1997; Frank & Lewis, 2004; Khojasteh, 1993; Rainey,
Backoff, & Levine, 1976; Wittmer, 1991).
In the literature, there are two perspectives on why the motivations of public- and
private-sector employees differ: attraction-selection-attrition (ASA) and adaptation-
socialization (AS; Wright & Grant, 2010). From the ASA perspective, public–private
differences in attitudes and perception emanate from self-selection of individuals with
high levels of PSM into public-sector work (Leisink & Steijn, 2008; Wright &
Christensen, 2010). The socialization view proposes that PSM is cultivated through
the socialization process by which organizational members are imbued with public
values and ethics in public institutions (Kjeldsen, 2012; Moynihan & Pandey, 2007).
Moynihan and Pandey (2007) maintained that “PSM may be formed by sociohistorical
factors before employees enter the organization, but it will also be influenced by the
organizational environment in which employees find themselves” (p. 42; Kjeldsen,
2012; Moynihan & Pandey, 2007)
Our focus here is on the relationship between PSM and sector-choice decisions of
job seekers with the ASA framework. Although this relationship has been found to be
straightforward, most of the findings come from empirical research based in Western
countries (Kim & Vandenabeele, 2010). The purpose of our study is twofold. First, we
will primarily investigate to what extent PSM influences public-sector employment
choice at a pre-entry level in Korea. A theory is said to be a good theory if it is applied
to reality in as many contexts as possible. Except for several studies (Kim, 2006;
Bangcheng, 2009; Bangcheng, Tang, & Zhu, 2008), most empirical studies on PSM
have been made in Western society contexts such as the United States and other
Western countries. Given that institutional and cultural factors in a society influence
the social behavior of members within the society, motives and PSM-related behaviors
may vary across cultures and nations (Flanagan, Bowes, Jonsson, Csapo, & Sheblanova,
1998; Koehler & Rainey, 2008). This study seeks to uncover whether PSM serves as a
predictor of public-sector employment in the Korea context.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT