Does Fundraising Professionalization Pay?

DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21212
Date01 September 2016
Published date01 September 2016
AuthorMarkus Gmür,Diana Betzler
27
N M  L, vol. 27, no. 1, Fall 2016 © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/nml.21212
Journal sponsored by the Jack, Joseph and Morton Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences, Case Western Reserve University.
Does Fundraising
Professionalization Pay?
THE IMPACT OF ORGANIZATIONAL FUNDRAISING CAPABILITY
ON A CHARITY S NET REVENUE FROM PRIVATE DONATIONS
Diana Betzler, 1 Markus Gmür 2
1 ZHAW, Zurich University of Applied Sciences , Switzerland
2 University of Fribourg , Switzerland
Although fundraising organizations in the third sector have gone through a progressive
professionalization process, it remains unclear whether this development has led to any
financial benefits. This article focuses on the question of whether or not it pays off for
fundraising organizations to invest in professionalization. The data for this study come
from 165 organizations representing 45 percent of the Swiss fundraising market. We first
propose the term “organizational fundraising capability” as a new construct for measuring
the degree of professionalization and rationalization in fundraising management. We then
analyze its relationship to overall net revenue from donations as well as the growth of net
revenue from donations. Our analysis indicates that, in addition to organizational size
measured by total revenue, revenue share from donations, and expansion strategy, fund-
raising capability makes an important contribution to explaining both an institution s net
revenue from fundraising and the level of increase in net donations. The consequences for
the development of professionalization and rationalization in fundraising are discussed.
Keywords: charity , nonprofit , sector , fundraising , performance , organizational theory
TO WHAT DEGREE IS THE FINANCIAL SUCCESS of a fundraising organization dependent
on the level of its organizational capability to raise donations? Are charity organizations
that strategically and systematically plan fundraising based on market analysis and scientific
methods more successful than those working in a short-term, spontaneous, nonstrategic
fashion?
Despite persistent criticism of the progressive economization of the nonprofit sector and the
related fears that such organizations are losing their philanthropic and social orientation, in
Correspondence: Diana Betzler, School of Management and Law, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences,
Bahnhofplatz 12, Winterthur 8400, Switzerland. E-mail: bera@zhaw.ch.
We thank various people for their contribution to this project. Special thanks are given to the Swiss watchdog organization for donation-
collecting human service organizations (Foundation ZEWO) and Martina Ziegerer, ZEWO managing director, for the provision of the
data. Furthermore, we thank the School of Management and Law of the Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW) for their fi nancial
support.
Nonprofi t Management & Leadership DOI: 10.1002/nml
28 BETZLER, GMÜR
practice, the process of professionalization in fundraising management has continued (Hager,
Rooney, and Pollak 2002 ; Tempel 1999 ). Both large and small nonprofits at the international
and local levels are expanding in-house capacity and expertise to carry out systematic fundraising.
These issues increasingly receive attention in the research literature, as our literature review
shows. However, the empirical research literature does not provide any theory-based con-
structs that can be used to map out this multifaceted development of building-up fundraising
capability and to analyze the relationship to influencing and contributing factors. Therefore,
in this article, we attempt to provide such a concept of fundraising capability.
Fundraising capability is a variable designed to measure an organization s capability and
effectiveness in increasing its donation revenue via systematic management of personnel
and processes. The development of the Fundraising Capability Index starts from research on
sociological professionalization (Abbott 1988 ; Caplow 1966 ) and from approaches of ratio-
nalization in organizational theory (Scott and Davis 2003 ; Weber 1980 ).
The first part of this article discusses the development of this concept. This is followed by
the empirical testing of the fundraising capability control variables as well as their effects on
successful fundraising, defined as donations net revenue and net growth of donations. The
empirical analysis is based on data collected from 165 fundraising organizations in Switzer-
land, which in total represent 45 percent of the Swiss donation market (US$1.7 billion).
Determinants of Fundraising Success
A number of determinants of fundraising success have been tested in the fundraising man-
agement research. These management determinants are based on widely accepted knowledge
regarding which systematic methods and competences achieve success in the private market for
donations. This includes, for example, having major donors on the boards of directors, involv-
ing experts in a consulting function, or applying specific fundraising techniques (Table 1 ).
In addition, Lu ( 2015 ) has found that a bureaucratic orientation determines the amount of
government funding. It is important to note, however, that thus far only isolated management
factors have been empirically tested.
However, we found no approach that measures the multifaceted phenomenon of fundraising
capability from the perspective of organizational development using management variables.
In our study, we embedded some of the management variables from Table 1 into a theory-
based, systematic, and integrative concept that measures an organization s capability to carry
out successful fundraising.
Table 1 . Management Variables as Determinants of Fundraising Success
Determinants Studies
Presence of donors on board of directors Betzler ( 2015 ); Hodge and Piccolo ( 2005 )
Involvement of professional fundraising consultants Marudas and Jacobs ( 2010 )
Human resources (management, employees,
volunteers)
Callen ( 1994 ); Hager, Rooney and Pollak ( 2002 ); Proper et al. ( 2009 );
Ritchie and Eastwood ( 2006 ); Sieg and Zhang ( 2012 )
Formalization of structures and processes Chen ( 2009 ); Edwards ( 1994 ); Lu ( 2015 ); Siciliano ( 1996 )
Application of specific fundraising techniques Sargeant and Kähler ( 1999 )

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT