Data show no improvement in nonprofit board diversity
Published date | 01 November 2017 |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1002/nba.30380 |
Date | 01 November 2017 |
NOVEMBER 2017
7
NONPROFIT BUSINESS ADVISOR
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company • All rights reserved
DOI: 10.1002/nba
(See DATA on page 8)
Industry News
Data show no improvement
in nonprot board diversity
The latest research from BoardSource shows that
nonprots have made little headway in terms of
board diversity, and aren’t taking the steps necessary
to improve on that front in the near future.
As outlined in BoardSource’s Leading with Intent:
2017 National Index of Nonprot Board Practices,
a biennial study of nonprot board composition,
culture and performance, some 90 percent of non-
prot CEOs and board chairs are white, as are 84
percent of general board members. That’s almost
unchanged from the 2015 survey, which found 89
percent of CEOs, 90 percent of board chairs and
80 percent of general board members to be white.
What’s more, the number of nonprot boards that
are all white inched up from 2015, at 27 percent now
compared to 25 percent two years ago.
In fact, the number of nonprot board members
For the rst time, Charity Navigator and Guid-
eStar will combine their resources and knowledge
of nonprot organizations to compile a more com-
prehensive database of impact-related information
and metrics, making it easier for the public to see
what a charity has accomplished alongside its for-
mal Charity Navigator ratings.
Starting on Giving Tuesday, Charity Navigator
will publish results information gathered by Guid-
eStar. According to the groups, Gold and Platinum
GuideStar Seal of Transparency holders will have
their results and programmatic information pub-
lished on their Charity Navigator prole pages for
donors to review.
The collaboration will make it easier for charities
to share their results and impact-related informa-
tion with the largest possible audience, reaching
a combined 20 million people each year, Charity
Navigator said.
Though both groups compile information
on nonprots, their databases don’t completely
overlap.
GuideStar—noted as the largest source of non-
prot information—has impact- and results-related
information for more than 13,000 nonprots, while
Charity Navigator, as the largest independent
evaluator and rater of nonprots, has information
and ofcial ratings for some 9,000 organizations.
Just about 2,000 nonprots are proled on both
sites, but that number should rise substantially as
the new collaboration takes foot, the groups said.
The initiative will also include data from other
impact-focused platforms, including Classy’s
Progress framework, which is used to recognize
programmatic performance for the Classy Awards,
and GlobalGiving’s GG Rewards program.
“Collaborating with the sector to obtain and
publish impact-related data is an exciting opportu-
nity for both donors and nonprots,” said Michael
Thatcher, CEO of Charity Navigator. “The data
won’t impact a charity’s ratings on Charity Navi-
gator, but it does signal to all that the importance
of sharing impact-related information is the next
phase of accountability and transparency for pub-
lic charities.”
According to Jacob Harold, president and CEO
of GuideStar, the effort will also help do away with
the “overhead myth,” the use of simple nancial
ratios of overhead expenses versus revenue to de-
termine if an organization is effective and efcient
with its resources.
“It’s very encouraging to see Charity Navigator
seeking out and sharing data that speaks to impact
nonprots are having on their missions,” Harold
said in a statement. “Simply put, this partnership
will help donors make better decisions. What’s
more, this data sharing allows nonprots to main-
tain their focus on their missions.”
For more information, visit http://www.charity
navigator.org or http://www.guidestar.org. ■
GuideStar, Charity Navigator to combine data on charity impact metrics
To continue reading
Request your trial