DALE O. SMITH. U. S. Military Doctrine: A Study and Appraisal. Pp. xiii, 256. New York: Duell, Sloan, and Pearce; Boston: Little, Brown, and Company, 1955. $3.50

AuthorW.D. Puleston
DOI10.1177/000271625630400129
Published date01 March 1956
Date01 March 1956
Subject MatterArticles
154
those
who
read
it,
he
feels,
will
await
with
interest
the
succeeding
volume.
HENRY
H.
SIMMS
Ohio
State
University
RALPH
KORNGOLD.
Thaddeus
Stevens.
Pp.
xiv,
460.
New
York:
Harcourt,
Brace,
and
Company,
1955.
$6.00.
Thaddeus
Stevens
remains
one
of
the
most
paradoxical
and
little
appreciated
fig-
ures
of
the
Civil
War
period.
Loving
free-
dom
as
few
men
of
his
time
did,
he
hated
with
equal
ardor.
Possessed
of
intellectual
stature
and
genuine
political
shrewdness,
occupying
a
dominant
position
in
govern-
ment
during
the
early
postwar
years,
he
is
remembered
chiefly
for
his
bitterness,
his
hatred,
and
his
frustration.
More
than
a
decade
ago
Richard
Current
wrote
an
ex-
cellent
biography
of
&dquo;Old
Thad,&dquo;
yet
many
questions
were
unanswered,
many
prob-
lems
unsolved.
Now
Ralph
Korngold,
au-
thor
of
a
popular
joint
study
of
Garrison
and
Phillips,
attempts
a
new
appraisal
of
this
strange
man.
The
author
has
divided
his
book
into
four
parts.
Law
and
Politics
tells
of
the
barren,
unhappy
Vermont
childhood;
the
study
of
law;
the
early
days
in
Pennsyl-
vania ;
and
makes
up
about
one-fifth
of
the
volume.
Congressional
Interlude
is
a
rela-
tively
brief
discussion
of
Stevens’
early
Congressional
experience
and
the
events
that led
to
Secession.
About
two-thirds
of
the
volume
is
devoted
to
the
struggle
of
Stevens,
first
against
Lincoln
and
then
against
Johnson.
The
early
years
of
Stevens’
life
are
treated
in
conventional
fashion.
It
is
with
his
last
decade
that
the
author
is
chiefly
concerned.
Here
the
author
be-
comes
a
pleader
in
attempting
to
show
that
Johnson
was
as
incompetent,
as
un-
stable,
and
as
unprincipled
as
he
was
so
commonly
portrayed
a
half-century
ago
and
in
attempting
to
show
that
Lincoln
was
inferior
in
vision,
courage,
and
char-
acter
to
Stevens.
The
author
loves
freedom
and
those
who
fought
for
freedom.
He
seems
to
assume
that
all
who
have
fought
for
freedom
are
inherently
good,
competent,
even
superior.
He
attempts
to
increase
the
stature
of
Stevens
by
belittling
all
who
opposed
him.
He
even
goes
to
the
extreme
of
commit-
ting
almost
every’
sin
recognized
by
the
objective
and
painstaking
historian.
In
one
section
of
approximately
thirty
pages,
this
reviewer
finds
careless
proofreading
(p.
172),
misquotes
(p.
174),
misinter-
pretations
(pp.
175, 179,
194),
faulty
logic
(pp.
184,
189),
sensational
and
unsup-
ported
statements
(p.
197),
oversimplifi-
cation
(p.
198),
and
an
uncritical
use
of
sources
(p.
201).
The
author
has
repeat-
edly
gone
to
old,
discredited,
and
strongly
biased
sources.
It
is
not
necessary
to
malign
Andrew
Johnson,
to
distort
and
misinterpret
the
leadership
of
Lincoln,
in
order
to
admire
the
courage,
recognize
the
superb
political
leadership,
and
regret
the
lack
of
apprecia-
tion
commonly
accorded
Thaddeus
Stevens.
Mr.
Komgold’s
heart
is
in
the
right
place;
it
is
unfortunate
that
he
chose
such
un-
critical
means
to
arrive
at
such
question-
able
conclusions.
RALPH
ADAMS
BROWN
State
University
of
New
York
Cortland,
N. Y.
DALE
O.
SMITH.
U.
S.
Military
Doctrine:
A
Study
and
Appraisal.
Pp.
xiii,
256.
New
York:
Duell,
Sloan,
and
Pearce;
Boston:
Little,
Brown,
and
Company,
1955. $3.50.
General
Smith,
class
of
1934
West
Point,
flew
thirty-one
combat
missions
in
World
War
II
in
command
of
a
B-17
group.
Subsequently
as
director
of
education
at
Air
University
he
compiled
Air
Force
Leadership,
the
official
manual
of
the
Air
Force.
His
text
will
convince
any
reader
that
he
writes
with
authority,
sincerity,
and
deep
conviction.
Beginning
with
the
views
of
Washington
on
our
military
policy,
he
outlines
the
doctrines
of
Clausewitz,
Jo-
mini,
Dennis
and
Alfred
Mahan,
and
others
preparatory
to
relating
the
impact
of
avia-
tion
on
land
and
sea
power.
In
his
Intro-
duction,
he
reminds
readers
of
the
danger-
ous
Anglo-American
habit
of
denouncing
war
as
something
so
unholy
that
it
must
be
ignored,
not
studied,
and
he
chides
Americans
of
today
who
still
refuse
to
study
why
wars
continue
to
recur.
The
General
offers
his
countrymen
much
ex-
cellent
advice.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT