Commercial activity in new university business schools: trends and predictions for the future

Date01 January 2004
Published date01 January 2004
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.661
AuthorChristopher Prince,Graham Beaver
Commercial activity in new university
business schools: trends and
predictions for the future
Christopher Prince and Graham Beaver*
Nottingham Business School, UK
Commercial activity, or third leg activity as the Higher Education Funding Council for
England (HEFCE) defines it, and the income it generates, is of increasing importance to
all higher education institutions (DES, 2003; CEML, 2002).
For new or modern university business schools in particular, the falling unit of resource
attaching to HEFCE student teaching income and the virtual disappearance of research
revenues as a result of the poor results in the 2001 Research Assessment Exercise (RAE),
has combined to produce a scenario in which commercial activity is likely to be an
increasing priority as business schools attempt to remain effective and solvent.
Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Strategic Change, Jan–Feb 2004
of new university business schools. A close
examination of commercialization considered
in the HEFCE Report focuses primarily on sci-
ences and technology using such measures as
contract research, intellectual property (such
as patents and licensing) and spin-off firms.
Although there are measures of programmes
and consultancy linked to business in the
survey, these are not disaggregated sufficiently
to identify business school performance.
The research conducted for this paper
focuses on the commercial activity of new uni-
versity business schools and includes business
and management schools in university colleges
and colleges of higher education. There are a
number of reasons for this inclusion. First, as
Prince (2000) and Prince and Stewart (2000)
point out, new and old universities primarily
operate in different sectors of the commer-
cial education market. Established universities
(pre-1992) tend to operate exclusively in the
executive education and MBA marketplace.
New universities, on the other hand, tend to
Strat. Change 13: 19–28 (2004)
Published online in Wiley InterScience
(www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/jsc.661 Strategic Change
*Cor respondence to: Graham Beaver, Nottingham
Business School, The Nottingham Trent University,
Nottingham NG1 4BU, UK.
E-mail: graham.beaver@lineone.net
Introduction
While there has been considerable research
into management development in general,
for example, Thomson et al. (1997, 2001),
specific research into in-company manage-
ment education by Prince (2000, 2002),
Prince and Stewart (2000) and Brown (1999)
and into executive education (Crainer, 1997),
there has been very little research into the
structuring and operation of commercial acti-
vity within new university business schools.
Indeed, what research there has been into uni-
versity commercial activity, for example the
Higher Education Business Interaction Survey
(HEFCE, 2003), examined all UK universities
at a level of aggregation that makes it impos-
sible to determine levels of business school
commercialization, let alone the performance

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT