Commentary: Public Policy Is Messy: Three Studies in Water Management

AuthorPhillip L. Isenberg
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12631
Published date01 September 2016
Date01 September 2016
Public Policy Is Messy: Three Studies in Water Management 751
Phillip L. Isenberg is an attorney and
director of the Public Policy Institute of
California who has served as Sacramento
city council member (1971–74), mayor of
Sacramento (1975–82), a member of the
California State Assembly (1982–96), and
a member of the Delta Stewardship Council
(2010–16).
E-mail : p.isenberg@comcast.net
Commentary
C alifornia is in the fifth year of a serious
drought. Our average temperatures are
increasing, and snow in the Sierra Nevada
mountain range, which provides a large part of our
regular water supply, is about 8 percent of normal. To
be sure, some of our major reservoirs have more water
in storage than last year, but statewide storage is still
below historical averages.
A slightly increased amount of rain last winter
has led to the abolition of mandatory state urban
water conservation rules. The hope seems to be that
voluntary conservation will be enough. Under most
circumstances this would define a crisis, or at least a
very serious problem.
In their article “Understanding What Shapes a
Polycentric Governance System,” Ramiro Berardo
and Mark Lubell bravely parachute into the middle
of classic water/environmental disputes. Is good
policy making more prevalent in the Tampa Bay
estuary in Florida, or in the Sacramento–San Joaquin
River delta in California, or in the Paraná River
delta in Argentina? Their conclusions are mixed, but
you have to scratch hard to find any evidence that
organizational heaven is around the corner.
For those of us with some responsibility for making
decisions on water and the environment and hoping
to “do good,” or at least muddle through as best we
can, this article clearly and embarrassingly shows
Phillip L. Isenberg
Public Policy Institute of California
Public Policy Is Messy: Three Studies in Water Management
Public Administration Review,
Vol. 76, Iss. 5, pp. 751–752. © 2016 by
The American Society for Public Administration.
DOI: 10.1111/puar.12631.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT