Collateral Consequences of Sex Offender Registration

AuthorRichard Tewksbury
DOI10.1177/1043986204271704
Published date01 February 2005
Date01 February 2005
Subject MatterArticles
10.1177/1043986204271704Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice / February 2005Tewksbury / SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION
Collateral Consequences of
Sex Offender Registration
RICHARD TEWKSBURY
University of Louisville
Sexoffender registration was widely implemented in the 1990s as a means ofenhancing commu-
nity awarenessof sex offenders to promote community safety. This study is one of the firstexam-
inations of the collateral consequences of sex offender registration from the perspectiveof the
offender. Drawingon data from 121 registered sex offenders in Kentucky, this research shows
that social stigmatization, loss of relationships, employment, and housing, and both verbal and
physical assaults are experienced by a significant minority of registered sex offenders.
Keywords: sex offender registration; collateral consequences; sex offenders
Criminal justice efforts to control violent and predatory crime take a vari-
ety of forms. In addition to traditional approaches of apprehending,
judicially processing, and incarcerating offenders, other efforts include pro-
viding intensive treatment (often in conjunction with incarceration), medical
interventions, civil confinement, and most recently, community notification
efforts to allowcitizens to be aware of and to monitor or avoid offenders. This
last effort has most frequently been implemented through the use of publicly
accessible registries of violent and sexual offenders posted on the Internet.
Such efforts aim to both promote community awareness of offenders’ pres-
ence and deter offenders via reductions in their opportunities to locate and
access unsuspecting and vulnerable victims. Community notification and
registration efforts, however, present a high likelihood of additional collat-
eral consequences also befalling offenders.
The concept of deterrence is based on the idea that the presence or threat of
sanction will divert potential criminal offenders from committing criminal
67
This research was funded in part by the Foundation for the Scientific Study of Sexuality.
Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, Vol. 21 No. 1, February 2005 67-81
DOI: 10.1177/1043986204271704
© 2005 Sage Publications

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT