The Changing Character of the Participants in War: Civilianization of Warfighting and the Concept of 'Direct Participation in Hostilities
Author | Charles Garraway |
Position | Associate Fellow at Chatham House on the International Security Programme and a Fellow of the Human Rights Centre, University of Essex |
Pages | 177-186 |
VII
The Changing Character of the Participants
in War: Civilianization of
Warfighting and the Concept of "Direct
Participation in Hostilities"
Charles Garraway*
Thefact that the nature of conflict has changed is not in dispute. The question
that is being asked is how this has affected the traditional law of armed con-
flict, particularly as it has developed in the modern era. Modern codification of the
law began almost simultaneously on opposite sides of the Atlantic. In the United
States, during the Civil War, Dr. Lieber drafted the Lieber Code, 1designed for the
Unionist forces. Meanwhile, in Europe, Henry Dunant, following his experience at
the Battle of Solferino, was working to fulfill his dream of providing succor to the
victims of armed conflict. The first emanation of this was the Geneva Convention
of 1864.2
What was of particular interest in both these initiatives is the emphasis on those
who took adirect part in hostilities. In both Europe and the United States, conflict
was restricted to defined geographical areas. The limits on the range of weaponry
meant that this could be so. Thus there was, for the most part, aclear distinction
*Associate Fellow at Chatham House on the International Security Programme and aFellow of
the Human Rights Centre, University of Essex.
To continue reading
Request your trial