Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the Effort?

Published date01 February 2004
AuthorJohn Stansbury,Renée A. Irvin
Date01 February 2004
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x
Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the Effort? 55
Renée A. Irvin
University of Oregon
John Stansbury
University of Nebraska
Citizen Participation in Decision Making:
Is It Worth the Effort?
It is widely argued that increased community participation in government decision making pro-
duces many important benefits. Dissent is rare: It is difficult to envision anything but positive
outcomes from citizens joining the policy process, collaborating with others and reaching consen-
sus to bring about positive social and environmental change. This article, motivated by contextual
problems encountered in a participatory watershed management initiative, reviews the citizen-
participation literature and analyzes key considerations in determining whether community par-
ticipation is an effective policy-making tool. We list conditions under which community participa-
tion may be costly and ineffective and when it can thrive and produce the greatest gains in effec-
tive citizen governance. From the detritus of an unsuccessful citizen-participation effort, we arrive
at a more informed approach to guide policy makers in choosing a decision-making process that
is appropriate for a communitys particular needs.
Introduction
CBEP (Community-Based Environmental Protec-
tion) is designed to maximize the use of scarce re-
sources, encourage local support, and consider the
economic well-being of communities.
Environmental Protection Agency (1996)
Notwithstanding the ambiguous mention of using scarce
resources, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
should be commended for its efforts to incorporate more
citizen involvement into environmental protection pro-
grams (Fiorino 2000). With improved community relations
as a motivating goal, the EPA pushed for national and re-
gional enhancements in environmental decision making
throughout the latter half of the 1990s. This ambitious ef-
fort has not been limited to the EPA, nor to environmental
management. At all levels of government, citizen-partici-
pation programs have been launched since the 1950s (Day
1997), with the underlying assumption that if citizens be-
come actively involved as participants in their democracy,
the governance that emerges from this process will be more
democratic and more effective.
Arguments for enhanced citizen participation often rest
on the merits of the process and the belief that an engaged
citizenry is better than a passive citizenry (King, Feltey,
and Susel 1998; Putnam 1995; Arnstein 1969). With citi-
zen participation, formulated policies might be more real-
istically grounded in citizen preferences, the public might
become more sympathetic evaluators of the tough deci-
sions that government administrators have to make, and
the improved support from the public might create a less
divisive, combative populace to govern and regulate. How-
ever, incorporating citizen input into agency decision mak-
Renée A. Irvin is an assistant professor in the Department of Planning, Public
Policy, and Management at the University of Oregon. An applied
microeconomist by training, her research covers many fields, including health
outcomes, environmental valuation, the regulation of nonprofit organiza-
tions, and philanthropy. She directs the University of Oregons graduate cer-
tificate program in not-for-profit management. E-mail: rirvin@uoregon.edu.
John Stansbury is an associate professor of civil engineering at the Univer-
sity of Nebraska. His research centers on ecological and human risk assess-
ment and the use of multicriteria decision-making methods for environmental
decision making. His recent research has included modeling regional aquatic
habitat changes from alternative engineering criteria, as well as decision
support systems for water resources. E-mail: jstansbu@unomaha.edu

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT