Chapter 20 Outline

JurisdictionUnited States

Chapter 20

Remedies for Patent Infringement

§20.01 Introduction

§20.02 Injunctions

[A] Statutory Basis: 35 U.S.C. §283
[B] Permanent Injunctions
[1] Generally
[2] Federal Circuit Decisions Before eBay v. MercExchange (U.S. 2006)
[3] The eBay v. MercExchange (U.S. 2006) Standard
[4] Appellate Standard of Review
[5] Factor (1): Irreparable Harm
[a] Generally
[b] Causal Nexus Requirement
[i] Apple III (Fed. Cir. 2013)
[ii] Apple IV (Fed. Cir. 2015)
[c] Standard Essential Patents/FRAND Licensing
[6] Factor (2): Inadequate Remedies at Law
[7] Factor (3): Balance of Hardships
[8] Factor (4): Public Interest
[9] Contempt Proceedings for Violation of Permanent Injunction
[C] Preliminary Injunctions
[1] Generally
[2] Preliminary Injunction Factors
[3] Appellate Standard of Review
[4] Choice of Law
[5] Procedural Considerations
[6] Factor (1): Patentee Likely to Succeed on the Merits
[7] Factor (2): Patentee Likely to Suffer Irreparable Harm
[a] Generally
[b] Causal Nexus Requirement
[c] Disproving Irreparable Harm
[8] Factor (3): Balance of the Equities Tips in Patentee's Favor
[9] Factor (4): Injunction Is in the Public Interest

§20.03 Ongoing Royalties for Future Infringements

[A] Generally
[B] Illustrative Decisions
[C] Criticism of Ongoing Royalty Awards

§20.04 Damages for Past Infringements

[A] Statutory Basis: 35 U.S.C. §284
[B] Compensatory Damages
[1] Lost Profits
[a] The Panduit Analysis
[i] Demand for the Patented Product
[ii] Absence of Acceptable Noninfringing Substitutes
[iii] Manufacturing and Marketing Capability
[iv] Amount of Profit
[b] Federal Circuit Expansion of Lost Profits Justification
[c] Price Erosion Damages
[d] Territoriality Issues
[i] Generally
[ii] WesternGeco (U.S. 2018)
[2] Apportionment, Entire Market Value Rule, and Convoyed Sales
[a] Convoyed/Accessory Sales
[b] Entire Market Value Rule Versus Apportionment
[i] Apportionment in Lost Profits Damages
[ii] Apportionment in Reasonable Royalty Damages
[3] Established Royalty
[a] Generally
[b] "Built-In Apportionment"
[4] Reasonable Royalty
[a] Hypothetical Negotiation
[b] Date for Hypothetical Negotiation
[c] Analytical Approach
[d] Rejected 25% Rule of Thumb
[e] Rejected Nash Bargaining Solution

§20.05 Enhanced Damages and Willful...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT