Can’t Shake the Prison Guard Blues: Examining the Effects of Work Stress, Job Satisfaction, Boundary Violations, and the Mistreatment of Inmates on the Depressive Symptomatology of Correctional Officers
Published date | 01 December 2023 |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1177/07340168221123229 |
Author | Robert M. Worley,Eric G. Lambert,Vidisha Barua Worley |
Date | 01 December 2023 |
Subject Matter | Articles |
Can’t Shake the Prison Guard
Blues: Examining the Effects
of Work Stress, Job Satisfaction,
Boundary Violations, and the
Mistreatment of Inmates on the
Depressive Symptomatology
of Correctional Officers
Robert M. Worley
1
, Eric G. Lambert
2
,
and Vidisha Barua Worley
1
Abstract
Many correctional officers who work in close proximity with inmates are at a heightened risk of
experiencing feelings of psychological distress. We analyzed 501 surveys collected fromcorrectional
officers within the Texas Department of Criminal Justice to identify characteristics of officers who
are likely to exhibit signs of depression. Our findings reveal that female officers, as well as officers
who work in higher custody levels, are more likely than other officers to report higher levels of
depressive symptomatology. We also found that officers who experienced high levels of self-
reported job-related stress were more likely to suffer from depression. Officers with attitudes
favorable to the mistreatment of inmates also reported higher levels of depression. Officers who
perceived their coworkers were engaging in boundary violations were no more or less likely to
exhibit signs of depression. Given these findings, we conclude that organizational and super visory
support, coupled with positive incentives and employee assistance programs, may help mitigate the
risks of depression for correctional officers, thereby making these salient staff more efficient and
effective in the prison workplace.
Keywords
life stress, depression, correctional officer, correctional officer-Inmate boundary violations,
prison officer
1
Lamar University, Department of Sociology, Social Work, and Criminal Justice, Beaumont, TX, USA
2
Indiana University Northwest, School of Public & Environmental Affairs, Dunes Medical, Gary, Indiana, USA
Corresponding Author:
Robert M. Worley, Lamar University, Department of Sociology, Social Work, and Criminal Justice, Beaumont,
TX 77710, USA.
Email: rworley@lamar.edu
Article
Criminal Justice Review
2023, Vol. 48(4) 474-494
© 2022 Georgia State University
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/07340168221123229
journals.sagepub.com/home/cjr
Working in institutional corrections involves interacting with individuals being held against their will
for violations of criminal law. This form of employment is unique and differs significantly from most
other occupations (Goldberg et al., 1996). It also carries risks. Armstrong and Griffin (2004) note that
“few other organizations are charged with the central task of supervising and securing an unwilling
and potentially violent population”(p. 577). Working in corrections presents challenges to officers,
and these challenges can increase the level of psychological strain and stress, ultimately influencing
officers”mental health (Ferdik & Smith, 2017). While there are a variety of different position in a
correctional facility, such as, teachers, maintenance workers, and administrative personnel, correc-
tional officers account for the largest group of staff working behind prison walls. These individuals
are assigned duties and tasks to ensure a safe, secure, and humane institution. Correctional officers
can be forced to work mandatory overtime, which, in turn, increases the incidence of accidents and
other mistakes, such as sloppy paperwork (Ross, 2016). The nature of correctional employment can
also require officers to work rotating shifts, which can take a toll on their mental and physical health
(Wetzel, 2017). These work conditions may also make it difficult for officers to spend time with their
loved ones or be available for routine visits to the doctor or dentist (Ross, 2016). Over time, they are
also more likely to develop heart disease, high blood pressure, impotence, and stomach ulcers as the
result of accumulated work stress. Officers are also at a heightened risk of contracting contagious
diseases from inmates (Leininger, 2019). In spite of the above occupational hazards, correctional offi-
cers tend to receive very low pay. In Texas, for example, a newly hired correctional officer only
receives an annual salary of $41,674 and maxes out in pay within six years at $51,338 (Texas
Department on Criminal Justice, 2022). Correctional officers are expected to support the rehabilita-
tion of inmates, while also maintaining control (Worley & Worley, 2011).
The mental health of correctional staff matters. The workplace itself may contribute, in either a
positive or a negative manner, to the mental wellbeing of officers. Psychological distress and depres-
sive symptoms can be detrimental for correctional staff (Badru et al., 2018; Goldberg et al., 1996; Liu
et al., 2013; Obidoa et al., 2011). When officers suffer from extreme episodes of depression, the
day-to-day operations of the correctional facility can be impacted. Mental illness, such as depressio n,
may result in burnout or higher use of sick days –either outcome can result in fellow officers being
required to work mandatory overtime (Lambert, Edwards, et al., 2005; Worley & Worley, 2013).
Increasing the psychological wellbeing of correctional officers will result in a more professional
workforce, which will assist in inmate rehabilitation, thereby making society a safer place. While
research has examined how workplace variables contribute to the job stress of corrections officers,
few studies have explored how workplace variables are linked to depressive symptomatology (i.e.,
depression) among correctional officers. This is an important area of study, as correctional officers
have a suicide rate 39% higher than the general public’s (Kochanek et al., 2015; Stack & Tsoudis,
1997).
In this exploratory study, we use the job demands-resources model to examine the link between
workplace variables and depressive symptomology among Texas correctional officers. The job
demands-resources model places workplace variables into two general categories of job
demands and job resources. Job demand variables are workplace factors that make the job more
challenging and impede officers”work success (Schaufeli & Taris, 2014). Conversely, job
resource variables are workplace factors that help officers be more successful in their jobs and/
or allow the job to be more pleasant; they can also act as a buffer from the more trying aspects
of the job (Demerouti et al., 2001). The current study examined the job demands of work stress,
boundary violations, and attitudes favorable to the mistreatment of inmates. We also examined
the job resource of job satisfaction. We hypothesized that work demands will raise the level of
depressive symptomatology, while job resources will lower it. This study’sfindings will help
both correctional administrators and scholars understand how different workplace variables are
associated with depression in correctional officers.
Worley et al. 475
To continue reading
Request your trial