Can We Shrink the Prisons Without Growing Crime?

AuthorRobert Weisberg
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12211
Date01 May 2016
Published date01 May 2016
POLICY ESSAY
DOWNSIZING PRISONS
Can We Shrink the Prisons Without
Growing Crime?
Decarceration, Decentralization, and the Meaning
of Realignment’s Success
Robert Weisberg
Stanford University
The California Public Safety RealignmentAct (AB 109) of 2011 was unquestionably
an exigent response to a dramatic crisis—the declaration by a federal court that
California’s prison system violated the Eighth Amendment. Although, as will be
noted in this essay,the law’s promoters argued that Realignment would improve the criminal
justice system in progressive ways (i.e., a new commitment to rehabilitation and reentry
services in “the community”), the primary motivation for the law was to get enough inmates
out of the state prisons to satisfy the court’s injunction. Thus, improving public safety was
not the primary goal of the law, and for some, it was not even an expectation. In the view of
many,the best hope was that AB 109 would not worsen public safety. Some critics considered
the law to be a grim legal necessity that at least risked an increase in crime (Petersilia, 2014),
whereas two U.S. Supreme Court justices spoke in more apocalyptic terms: Justices Scalia
and Alito, dissenting from affirmance of the injunction in Brown v. Plata (2011), were
confident that the court order that led to AB 109 was so likely to deal a serious blow to
public safety as to make the injunction illegal under the strictures of the Prison Litigation
Reform Act of 1995.
So to put things bluntly, in their conclusion that AB 109 has caused at most a very
small and very isolated increase in crime (the exception being a modest uptick in auto theft),
Jody Sundt, Emily Salisbury, and Mark Harmon (2016, this issue) have shown that that
the warnings were wrong. Thus, assuming that the ratio of prisoners to real estate has been
Direct correspondence to Robert Weisberg, Stanford Criminal Justice Center, Stanford University, Crown
Quadrangle, 559 Nathan Abbott Way, Stanford, CA 94305-8610, Room N221, Neukom Building (e-mail:
weisberg@law.stanford.edu).
DOI:10.1111/1745-9133.12211 C2016 American Society of Criminology 367
Criminology & Public Policy rVolume 15 rIssue 2

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT