Can an Efficacious Strategy for Curtailing Illegal Drug Sales Be Counted on to Reduce Violent Crime?

Published date01 August 2017
AuthorShani A. L. Buggs,Daniel W. Webster
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12326
Date01 August 2017
POLICY ESSAY
DRUG MARKET INTERVENTION
Can an Efficacious Strategy for Curtailing
Illegal Drug Sales Be Counted on to Reduce
Violent Crime?
Daniel W. Webster
Shani A. L. Buggs
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
In many cities, the illicit drug trade plays a significant role in generating other types
of crimes, especially violent crimes involving guns (Goldstein, Brownstein, Ryan, and
Bellucci, 1997; Levitt and Venkatesh, 2000; Ousey and Lee, 2004). Thus, it is no
surprise that law enforcement agencies have applied significant resources toward drug law
enforcement directed at disrupting illicit drug markets or otherwise at incarcerating those
involved in the drug trade. Drug law enforcement policies and practices, however, have
been controversial as a result of concerns about high levels of incarceration attributable to
drug law violations and racial disparities throughout the criminal justice system relevant to
drug offenses (Alexander, 2010; Carson and Golinelli, 2013). Although declining in recent
years, drug law violations are consistently the most frequent type of crime that leads to an
arrest (U.S. Department of Justice, 2016).
Given the perceived importance of the illicit drug market to crime and the law enforce-
ment and criminal justice resources directed at the problem, a relative dearth of rigorous
research has been aimed at examining the impact of various approaches to combatting
illegal drug sales. What research has been done has resulted in little evidence indicating
that traditional drug law enforcement tactics such as buy and busts, sweeps of open-air
drug markets, raids of stash houses, and prosecutions of drug-selling groups on criminal
conspiracy charges reduce violent crime. Indeed, such efforts commonly increase violent
crime (Mazerolle, Soole, and Rombouts, 2006; Werbet al., 2011). Even models that involve
targeting of hot spots for crime and complementary community efforts do not tend to lead
to significant reductions in violent crime (Mazerolle et al., 2006). The forces driving the
demand and the supply of illegal drugs seem to be robust to the application of tough laws,
Direct correspondence to Daniel W. Webster, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N.
Broadway, Room 593, Baltimore, MD 21205-1996 (e-mail: dwebster@jhu.edu).
DOI:10.1111/1745-9133.12326 C2017 American Society of Criminology 821
Criminology & Public Policy rVolume 16 rIssue 3

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT