Building Recovery Capital: The Role of Faith-Based Communities in the Reintegration of Formerly Incarcerated Drug Offenders

Published date01 July 2017
Date01 July 2017
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1177/0022042617696916
Subject MatterArticles
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022042617696916
Journal of Drug Issues
2017, Vol. 47(3) 370 –382
© The Author(s) 2017
Reprints and permissions:
sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/0022042617696916
journals.sagepub.com/home/jod
Article
Building Recovery Capital: The
Role of Faith-Based Communities
in the Reintegration of Formerly
Incarcerated Drug Offenders
Kristen Connolly1 and Robert Granfield1
Abstract
Recovery capital is an important concept in the field of addiction studies. A person’s access to
recovery capital can mean the difference between the termination of addiction and successful
reintegration or ongoing criminality and drug use. Increasingly, religious institutions are playing
a vital role in the provision of social services, including addiction services that provide access
to recovery capital. This article begins by exploring the concept of recovery capital and its
utility in the successful reintegration of offenders. It then uses a case study to show how one’s
religious organization plays an important role in providing the necessary recovery capital for
the desistance of drug abuse and for a successful reintegration into the community. Through
in-depth interviews with several persistent adult offenders, this article demonstrates that
religious organizations may play an important role in providing the recovery capital that so
many persistent drug offenders are lacking.
Keywords
addiction, recovery, reentry, faith-based, recovery capital
Introduction
Nearly one of every 100 U.S. citizens is currently incarcerated in our nation’s prisons and jails,
80% of whom abuse drugs or alcohol (NADCP.org). In 2012, 2.2 million people were incarcer-
ated in the United States, and more than 50% of them were incarcerated for drug-related offenses
(Carson & Golinelli, 2013). According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics (2014), approximately
77% of those who are incarcerated for a drug-related offense will reoffend within 5 years of their
release. These high rates of incarceration, drug abuse, and recidivism persist, despite a potlatch
of our best efforts at drug control legislation. This persistence makes it very clear that we must
look for a solution beyond criminal sanctions if we desire to curtail the illegal drug use and addic-
tion that far too often leads to recidivism after release.
In many instances throughout the recent past, government agencies have been criticized for
their inadequate response to the needs of minorities or the extremely impoverished. This criti-
cism is especially salient in the case of the needs of the postrelease addicted (Dyson, 2006; Van
1University at Buffalo, NY, USA
Corresponding Author:
Kristen Connolly, Department of Sociology, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA.
Email: klconnol@buffalo.edu
696916JODXXX10.1177/0022042617696916Journal of Drug IssuesConnolly and Graneld
research-article2017

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT