Book Review: Clear, T. R. Imprisoning Communities: How Mass Incarceration Makes Disadvantaged Neighborhoods Worse New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2007. xv pp., 255 pp. ISBN 0195305795

AuthorAshley Demyan
Published date01 March 2010
Date01 March 2010
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1177/0734016809349173
Subject MatterArticles
change. Does she achieve that goal and is the book suitable for other audiences? While Gilmore’s
political economic analysis on the growth of the prison system in California is thorough and fasci-
nating, her writing style is unnecessarily wordy and filled with academic jargon that makes it tedious
to read. Additionally, the organization of the book is often confusing because there is a great deal of
overlap among some chapters while others seem to be stand-alone chapters. Part of the problem may
be that Gilmore tries to cover two separate topics within one book: an explanation of prison expan-
sion and a case study of an activist group. Although the ROC formed in response to perceived prob-
lems in the California prison system, chapter 5 focuses more on the internal and external racism and
strife among the women during the formation of the group.
Social activists will find thisbook worthwhile because it offersa valuable and plausibleexplanation
of the intersectionof racist ideology and prison expansion. While I would not recommendthis book for
undergraduate classes, I might use it in graduate classes with the disclaimer that it is written from an
activist perspective. Overall, I would recommend this book to those who are interested in theCalifor-
nia prison system even though her writing style and organization make the book a bit tedious toread.
Clear, T. R.
Imprisoning Communities: How Mass Incarceration Makes Disadvantaged Neighborhoods Worse
New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2007. xv pp., 255 pp. ISBN 0195305795
Reviewed by: Ashley Demyan, University of California, Irvine
DOI: 10.1177/0734016809349173
As the prison population in the United States continues to grow, so does the disadvantage in certain
communities whose residents experience high rates of incarceration. In this book, Todd Clear exam-
ines the many forms of disadvantage and then explores potential strategies for change. Thoroughly
researched, a review of past studies is merged with both local (Tallahassee, Florida) and national
data and produces a compelling account of the ways in which mass incarceration affects not only
incarcerated individuals but entire communities as well.
The first part of the book provides an overview of historical, theoretical, and policy shifts that
have accounted for the dramatic rise in the prison population over the past three decades. The two
main theories behind incarceration—deterrence and incapacitation—are discussed at length in chap-
ter 2, with consideration given to the limitations of each. Three policy shifts have also had an impact
on individual and community experiences of incarceration, with effects primarily focused on minor-
ity populations. Enacted in the 1980s, drug laws have dramatically increased the prison population.
If this increased the prison population, then broad recidivism laws (such as California’s three-strikes
law) are keeping the population high. Finally, collateral consequences, including employment
restrictions and supervision strategies, create barriers to a successful life after release.
The next section details the central argument of the book, which is a systematic discussion of the
ways in which mass imprisonment is affecting certain communities within the United States. Young,
minority males from impoverished neighborhoods are disproportionately targeted by the criminal
justice system. Clear states, ‘‘Neighborhoods are the building blocks for community life, and com-
munity life is an important wellspring for a good quality of life’’ (p. 69). When young, minority
males are removed from these neighborhoods, specific problems are bound to occur, thus transform-
ing these communities into what Clear terms ‘‘prison places.’’ Already isolated from other neighbor-
hoods through methods of informal segregation, poor and minority communities—especially those
residents in-and-out of prison—have limited social networks and weak social capital. It is in these
neighborhoods that mass incarceration has its most profound negative effects.
126 Criminal Justice Review 35(1)
126

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT