Book Review: C. L. Johnson Police Use of Intelligence Networks for Reducing Crime El Paso, TX: LFB Scholarly Publishing, LLC. ix, 251 pp. $70.00. ISBN 978-159332-381-3

AuthorShila R. Hawk-Tourtelot
DOI10.1177/0734016811401323
Published date01 June 2011
Date01 June 2011
Subject MatterArticles
Book Reviews
C. L. Johnson
Police Use of Intelligence Networks for Reducing Crime El Paso, TX: LFB Scholarly Publishing, LLC. ix, 251 pp. $70.00.
ISBN 978-159332-381-3
Reviewed by: Shila R. Hawk-Tourtelot, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA
DOI: 10.1177/0734016811401323
Charles Johnson’s Police Use of Intelligence Networks for Reducing Crime contributes to the
scholarly examination of policing in three ways: (a) provides details of the history of policing, the
technologies being used by police, and police operations; (b) evaluates intelligence-led policing; and
(c) features considerations for policing policy and practice. Written by a retired Community Correc-
tions Supervisor and recent (2007) PhD recipient, this book can be used in both professional and
academic understandings of the intelligence-led policing model. It should be noted that the book
does not include theoretically tested relationships but was ‘‘designed to offer a descriptive report
of findings of a program evaluation itself designed to identify the strengths and weakness of an infor-
mation sharing process’’ (p. 8).
Johnson examines the paradox between an intelligence-led policing model and cross-departmental
communications. Grown out of the community-oriented policing model, intelligence-led policing is a
proactive focus of information gathering strategies, such as the use of informants and surveillance to
target repeat offender. In pursuit of improving police mission goals, Johnson draws from such influ-
ential scholars as Egon Bittner, Peter Manning, and James Q. Wilson to provide an in-depth review of
the development and significance of this model. Johnson claims its success would increase police–
community relations, workforce resources, clearance rates, and the quality of police services, but
to date has limited empirical findings on its administration. To examine this, the author uses a program
evaluation report of the Washington Homicide Investigation Tracking System (H.I.T.S.) and
individual-level data of its participants. This descriptive analysis suggests the intelligence-led poli-
cing model may be complicated by the propensity of the police and their departments to be more
self-serving and secretive than trusting and sharing, thus ‘‘productivity and efficacy are hampered
by the very nature of agency design’’ (p. 3).
Johnson divides the book into five chapters and eight appendices (full survey instruments).
Chapter 1 introduces the reader to the purpose and significance of the study. Although Johnson fails
to clearly define intelligence-led policing until the second page of this chapter, the organization and
use of subtitles smoothly guides the reader from the gap in existing knowledge on the topic, to the
research question, then implications and a brief mention of limitations. This is an appropriate set-up
for the level of detail presented in the following chapters.
Chapter 2 is a retrospective analysis of the policing models that led to the current initiative.
Johnson starts with the command and control structure, moves to explaining the professionalism era,
then focuses on the transactions of community-oriented policing and problem-solving policing to
intelligence-led policing. Johnson does not describe intelligence-led policing as a new paradigm
or model but as a modified approach to the existing policing strategies.
Criminal Justice Review
36(2) 213-231
ª2011 Georgia State University
Reprints and permission:
sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
http://cjr.sagepub.com

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT